2007-12-07 01:03:23 · 4 answers · asked by 19G30 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
Yeah, how about that? I thought he handled it very well for a politician. Same as JFK did 48 years ago. Religion didn't matter then and doesn't now. I would never vote for or against someone because they happen to be this or that. No one should. But that's what is about to happen. Some will vote for Hillary because she's female, some for Obama because he's black, some for Mitt because he's morman, some for Mike because he's Baptist and on and on. When they should be looking at the issues as most of us will.
2007-12-07 01:28:24 · answer #1 · answered by Ken B 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
he had a fine speech. what matters is not any agreements or differences we may have on theology, but his political philosophy.
religious views color the way we look at the world, and act in the world, but very few people want to turn this country into a theocracy, and I do not think that Romney is one of them.
I respect him, but am not sure I can vote for him because I do not necessarily agree with his politics.
2007-12-07 07:36:36 · answer #2 · answered by SAMUEL ELI 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The question of faith is infinitely-less important than the fact he is flying the flag of one of the two major parties that, between them, have dragged us down to a pitiful state. I would sooner have Satan himself if he ran as an INDEPENDENT.....Anteater
2007-12-07 08:22:01 · answer #3 · answered by anteater 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't matter to me. I know the history of Mormonism and what they believe. I wouldn't vote for him.
2007-12-07 01:08:25 · answer #4 · answered by Big Bear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋