I was saying after we invaded Afghanistan, that there was no way that Bush would invade Iraq. A few months later, he did.
After Iraq, nothing surprises me anymore.
2007-12-07 06:08:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by kusheng 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only the Congress has the power to send us to war. Better worry about them more than Bush. They sent us to Iraq and are keeping us there because they think that is best for our country. The President is just a fugure head. Has little real power to do anything.
2007-12-07 11:42:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by GABY 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The question could be--Is Iran keen to impression the U. S. into conflict by attempting to construct NUCLEAR weapons? Bush won't bypass to conflict except he has information of their plans to construct nuclear instruments. He won't be a hundred pc specific yet while this is extra effective than 50% and he won't be able to get the UN to sanction IRAN he will have not have been given any selection. if Iran is construction nuclear weapons. Or in the event that they are are in basic terms collecting the products for them then they could be stopped now on a similar time as we can purely could kill some hundred thousand of them. If we wait, We threat the lives of tens of millions of human beings and the destruction of numerous significant financial centers---which includes a number of our very own. possibly a nuclear substitute which will injury modern-day civilization. this is not any longer an basic selection, yet each and every time that little ACHMEDINJAD stands up and publicizes that Israel would be ate up by a pillar of hearth from the Muslims--it makes it plenty much less complicated. Bush has a problematical highway forward. He needs to maintain the enemies of america nervous of america each and all the on a similar time as he's being undermine by his political enemies right here at domicile. If it takes some problematical confer with do this, and the threat of sanctions then by all potential enable him do this. yet as quickly as we don't latest the enemies such as IRAN with a united front. If the U. S. political events are divided on no longer doing something and unsafe conflict. The Iranian management will straightforward do the comparable component. they're going to threaten our allies, with financial sanctions, and a few with destruction each and all the on a similar time as they deliver peace emissaries to the UN attempting to get sanctions lifted on their united states of america by crying they are in basic terms misunderstood and terrified of the great devil. the only distinction is they seem to be a THEOCRACY and have not have been given any inner opposition celebration to counter them. They stifle any descent with imprisonment and loss of life threat. america is a REPUBLIC with 2 very divided political events. One attempting to attain factors for the subsequent election, the different attempting to maintain america and the west for generations to return. strengthen up somewhat would you---it fairly is a risky international accessible and sometime it could be plenty closer to you than you think of. Iran already claims to have missiles that would hit EUROPE.
2016-11-14 17:52:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush is the very reason presidents need to be able to pass minimal psycological exams before they are allowed to take office, the guy is wacked in the head from 42 years of boozing it up!
He's interested in his legacy, talks to voices in his head, cuts wood with a chainsaw with no chain, can't ride his mothers Segway, his legacy will be when they define dufus, idiot, lunatic and anti christ it will all point to Little Georgey Bush.
2007-12-07 10:04:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by groingo 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
In a word yes,
i would have said more
but you remain anonymous and
keep your stuff private
this is very suspicious
but ask your self this
why has it been kept quiet that
a small tactical nuclear bomb was dropped on Syria on September 6th
by an American bomber accompanied by Israeli fighters
2007-12-07 16:14:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude thats what im saying.
he is a douche bag.
he says "were going to war to have peace"
thats like saying im gunna have sex to be a virgin you know?
2007-12-07 07:24:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Robanne <33 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Iran might though
2007-12-06 18:12:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by kevin s 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good change I would say, he's an idiot out of control.
2007-12-06 17:25:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sunny 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
well when they come over here I hope u are one of the first they catch.
2007-12-07 08:27:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by JOHNNIE B 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes, and don't forget chenny.
2007-12-09 04:44:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by misfitter 3
·
0⤊
0⤋