I think he was rite. and theres people out there who are trying to make it into a race issue.
2007-12-06 14:54:19 · 15 answers · asked by El Niche 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
I commend Joe Horn for shooting the burglars. This is what neighbors should be doing for each other. I would be honored to have Joe Horn to be my neighbor. Especially, today when our neighbors don't even take the time to talk or get to know their neighbors anymore.
2007-12-07 15:28:47 · answer #1 · answered by Gun Carrier 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have a lot of questions, but it all comes down to this:
1. The individuals killed would not have been killed if they had not been committing a crime.
2. Mr. Horn was told by the 911 dispatcher NOT to confront the individuals.
3. None of this would be an issue if people were doing what they were supposed to be doing instead of trying to satisfy some selfish need (yes - Mr. Horn was even being selfish - he wanted to be a "hero" by stopping a couple of burglars).
It is all a shame. But I also thing there are individuals that will turn anything into a race issue these days, and I take that with a grain of salt. But there are questions, and I think they will eventually be answered.
2007-12-06 15:01:04 · answer #2 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was well within the right...He was LEGAL..
Trooper3 might be a little lost....
Perry said "The right to defend oneself from an imminent act of harm should not only be clearly defined in Texas law, but is intuitive to human nature." The legislation, which requires that the person defending themselves be unprovoked, also provides civil immunity for any justified action under the law. The Texas law takes effect September 1, 2007.
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2007/03/texas-governor-signs-shoot-first-law.php
2007-12-06 17:05:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
texas law gives one the right to use deadly force for the protection of their home or property.he was well within the law.for the dufus below who said i do not know about the case. if he were able to read he will be able to where i stated that it was texas law.from the way he talked there is no way he is really a cop.that was the law and still is the law.that same person has the right to use deadly force in the protection of a third party.
----retired texas deputy sheriff----
2007-12-06 21:53:10 · answer #4 · answered by charlsyeh 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
These folks don't live in Texas, obviously lol.
See, around here, you can't kill folks just for stealing (except for an old law that says you can hang a man for stealing your horse). You just can't do it. Just because you are holding a gun to them and telling them not to move or you will shoot does not mean that you can ACTUALLY shoot them, for any reason.
Around here, and I live in Houston, you also can't shoot people outside. If you want to claim self defense, first you gotta get them inside, then you really should make them back up on the linoleum (I've learned from experience they don't clean it up for you). Otherwise, yer goin' to jail hon :)
2007-12-06 15:26:26 · answer #5 · answered by Lisbeth 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he was on the phone with 911 and they were sending the police. they were stealing, not raping or robbing. they did not shoot at him or brandish a weapon.
if he felt an honest need to detain them, he should not have shot to kill. he could have run after them, or he could have shot at their legs.
but he should have just stayed on the phone with the police and continued to provide information.
he was completely and totally in the wrong, and he maliciously shot and killed those men. and he should go to jail.
oh, and he violated texas law. if they had been in his house when he shot them, he would not have been in violation of the law. but in this case, it seems he went out of his way to harm these people.
and by the way, I am a texan, born and raised, and i know how to shoot a gun.
2007-12-06 15:11:31 · answer #6 · answered by sllieder 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Personally, he did the right thing.
Professionally, he did the dumb thing. It could have turned out very bad for him.
TX has some very broad laws when it comes to using force against another in defense of self of property. He could get off criminally.
2007-12-06 14:59:03 · answer #7 · answered by California Street Cop 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
From a legal standpoint, he is going to have a tough time arguing his case. Anytime you initiate contact, you are going to have a hard time claiming self defense. Especially when you leave your house to do it.
I doubt this had anything to do with race, it was pretty clear to me his main objective was to protect his neighbor's house.
2007-12-06 14:58:07 · answer #8 · answered by trooper3316 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think he was right. The only people making it into a race issue is the local racist Q-X.
2007-12-06 15:10:56 · answer #9 · answered by woodyhou 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Listen to the 911 tape, he told them not to move and they entered Mr. Horn's yard and went towards him.
edit
So, Lisbeth, are you saying that if you try to stop a crime in Texas the criminals can LEGALLY attack you as long as you are not in your house?
2007-12-06 15:24:46 · answer #10 · answered by Gray Wanderer 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋