2007-12-06 12:38:12 · 7 answers · asked by Genopie R 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Puppets don't make sounds without the puppeteer doing the talking. Thus there could be no possible communication.
Unless, there was an Uncle Sam comedy hour, where Uncle Sam was performing the ventriloquist act.
Iraq: (obvious Yankee, imitating Iraqi accent) I think we need time alone, I want you to leave!
Uncle Sam: (Same voice different accent) What'd you SAY?
Iraq: I said, I want IRAN to LEAVE!
applause...
2007-12-06 13:21:13 · answer #1 · answered by HotDockett 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. The current administration has a vested interest beyond just national security to remain in place. It has always been Bush's goal to have a permanent presence in place in Iraq.
2007-12-06 23:46:16 · answer #2 · answered by Christopher B 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We would be stupid not to do it. It looks like we could have bigger fish to fry the way Putin is gearing up while the US is pre-occupied in Iraq and Afghanistan.
That midget has one big chip on his shoulder, and the dumb @ss Russian people are willing to let him continue to stir the pot for just 30 pieces of silver, or was it one quart of vodka that he gave them for their vote.
2007-12-06 20:53:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. We would have to. The only reason we're there now is because the government wants us there.
2007-12-06 20:45:03 · answer #4 · answered by DOOM 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes. But they won't because for now they need our money and protection.
2007-12-06 20:57:44 · answer #5 · answered by dadvice1 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why would they?
2007-12-06 20:58:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
WTF are they gonna do?
Besides they want us there
2007-12-06 20:40:52 · answer #7 · answered by Yhoshua 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋