Not only NO, but HELL NO! ! ! !
The 'mighty' U.N. can't even keep third world countries from researching nuclear, biological, &chemical weapons, so how will they be able to disarm the MOST POWERFUL Citizenship on the planet? ! ! ! !
That's what I'm SURE our founding forefathers intended, no matter WHAT the bleeding-heart liberal Demacrack socio-crats in D.C. are trying to perpetrate. . . . . . . .
The Second Amendment was meant to assure ALL Americans the way to defend and guarantee the continuance of ALL our other freedoms. . . . . . .
And this is what Pelosi, Clinton, Schumer, & Co. are SCARED SHITELESS OF! ! ! !
"An Armed Man is a CITIZEN, an Unarmed Man is a SLAVE!"
2007-12-07 02:17:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Grizzly II 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I, think that the united states, should pull out of the united nations. then, kick the delegates out of the us, then turn the U N building into an apartment complex.
right now, the united states, supplies about 80% of the U N's money , as well as most of the military, but who is running the U N ? it is people from 3rd world countries, that can't support themselves, nor defend themselves & those same people, want to reduce us, to the same level that they are.
Now, the U N, wants to put a tax on the american people, so the money can be spread around the glob, to these 3rd world countries,
if that tax does happen, the powers in these 3rd world countries, will skim money off the top, to enrich themselves, while the citizens of those countries, will benefit not a dimes worth.
2007-12-06 22:14:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roger W 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, recent actions of the U.N. are starting to be more and more disconcerting. It seems like since Kofi Annan left that they've become more and more of an organization striving for world domination. I believe the best action for the U.S. now is to stop paying our millions upon millions to them for membership dues, and hope that other nations follow suit. If they're planning on taking guns from honest, hard working American citizens, I believe that that would count as a foreign invasion, and anyone who aids them is committing an act of treason. I'll keep my guns, thank you, and if they disagree I'm completely ready to help fend off any attackers and terrorists that the military can't handle. Granted, I'll most certainly die in the process, but those stupid blue helmets make a good target.
So yeah, a resounding 'NO!' from me. It's just not right to say a person is no longer allowed from owning a bit of metal and wood or plastic.
2007-12-06 21:54:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by fishtrembleatmyname 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hell NO!
A bunch of corrupt and distrustful little group aren't they?
Must be that's where the Democrats get some training in stupidity. As it was said on Fox the other night, " Democrats will walk shoulder to shoulder for their blind cause off a cliff together."
2007-12-06 23:24:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Hunterbob 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not just no but hell no.
Screw that one world government crap.
They seek to saddle the world with rule by a burecratic aristocracy.... a parlimentary dictatorship, and I don't think enough of our country supports such an idea for it to actually ever happen.
2007-12-07 00:34:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't really trust politicians in Washington so trusting a group of people that raped and pillaged their way through East Africa IS NOT a good investment of our tax dollars.
2007-12-07 04:24:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by .45 Peacemaker 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, neither is giving the power over freedom loving americans to the UN. One of the most corrupt and liberal orginazations around.
2007-12-06 20:56:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by randy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I agree with Roger W.
Someone said, "The U.N.consists of the poor people of rich countries [that's us] supporting the rich people of poor countries [the inept and corrupt leaders of the third world]."
2007-12-06 23:10:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Andy S 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, only people with a bad gun history should be controlled, not us normal hunters and marksmen that fire a gun for recreation and survival.
2007-12-06 20:26:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jake 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. United Nations can kiss my sack
2007-12-06 20:24:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by negaduck 6
·
3⤊
0⤋