English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

....live with yourself for supporting the senseless murder of millions of defenseless babies every year?

Why should the child be punished for the parents irresponsibility?

Why should the child be punished because the parents were selfish and didn't want to be inconvenienced by a child?

2007-12-06 12:06:55 · 30 answers · asked by Me 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I know a lot of people who have tried for years to have a child but can't, and it sickens me that they are so broken hearted that they can't have children, yet there are people who can, and out of convenience, go and kill their own baby.

It is sickening.

There are also plenty of loving parents who would love to adopt. Again, why punish the children?

2007-12-06 12:19:21 · update #1

30 answers

When a person knows something is wrong and does not speak out against it, it makes that person just as guilty as if they did the wrong.
For instance if someone knows people are going to murder a person, and they do not report it to the Police, the law considers the silent person just as guilty as if they pulled the trigger, even if they were not at the location of the crime.
Abortion is murder of an innocent baby, even the Justices of the US Supreme Court that approved abortion are guilty of the murder of every single one of those babies.

2007-12-06 13:16:23 · answer #1 · answered by allan b 5 · 1 2

It's not murder that I support, but the right to make the choice.

Until you, yourself, have ever faced that choice, you cannot make it.

Nor can you make a choice for someone else.

I would never have an abortion. The very idea makes me ill.
BUT...I can not choose the circumstances for another. Nor can another choose mine. And I think, that it is better for a child to not have been born, than to live in a world where it is not wanted. I know I was loved as a child. Why should that be denied to another? How can you deny it?

If we are to reduce or eliminate abortions, we must advocate responsible reproduction. This means not only abstinence, but contraception and planning, for both genders. Then hopefully, there will be far fewer families who find themselves forced to make such a choice.

2007-12-06 12:19:56 · answer #2 · answered by Jewel 7 · 3 1

this is oftentimes what it comes right down to once you knock all the different arguments aside. i detect it very stressful while a professional-selection individual is conscious that unborn toddlers stay people and nonetheless helps aborting them. Yikes on toast. To the guy who reported viability - what approximately people who're no longer achieveable without the intervention of docs and clinical equipment? Say, people on respirators or people who require dialysis? might or no longer this is "no longer homicide" for somebody to shoot them in the pinnacle, because of the fact they are actually not achieveable all on their very own? How far do you're taking that argument? they won't be achieveable exterior the womb purely yet (in spite of the undeniable fact that that age is creeping decrease...), yet they are nonetheless alive. no longer achieveable exterior the womb would not equivalent non-residing. they are alive, they are human, and that they are actually not a factor of the female's physique. they are diverse human lives, and aborting them is incorrect. EDIT >if there have been purely one "proper" thank you to think of approximately this subject, then that view could be held by using maximum folk. Um. So maximum folk's proper? Did that prepare to, say, slavery? or the view that girls shouldn't vote because of the fact they are actually not sensible sufficient? How approximately Nazism in Germany - maximum folk of Germans felt that Jews weren't human. all of us know that one and all 3 of those majority-held evaluations are thoroughly, actual incorrect.

2016-10-19 11:21:46 · answer #3 · answered by holtzer 4 · 0 0

I do not believe in abortion, but I do not believe in putting someone down either that has made that type of decision. We do not know what the situation is for the girl/lady and cannot judge. We need to stand up against abortion, but love those that are going through it and tell them about the love of God and his forgiveness toward them.

2007-12-06 12:25:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

So it is irresponsible of a woman to get raped or a minor female to be subjected to incest? Or how about the fact that some women do take birth control and it fails resulting in pregnancy - how is that irresponsible? To tag irresponsibility to every situation is narrowminded.

I live with myself very well because I support choice - all choices. The choice to have an abortion which is legal, the choice to keep the child and raise it and the choice to put the child up for adoption.

Being a pacifist I would never have an abortion, but it is not my place to tell another person how they should conduct their life.

2007-12-06 12:12:55 · answer #5 · answered by genaddt 7 · 7 3

How can you live with yourself when people like you are the very people who, indirectly, killed my aunt by turning her down for an abortion, when doctors told her that her body could not support a pregnancy upon conception, and who died during childbirth?

I've said it FAR too many times tonight: Any woman has the right to exterminate a parasitic growth inside her body. It's not a baby until it's born, and no man has the right to tell any woman that she cannot get an abortion.

2007-12-06 12:13:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5 2

And why should the child be forced to live with a parent that will NOT LOVE that child which was FORCED onto them?

Also I think that you fail to realize that there is more to abortion that what you are being told and hear about.

Do you know what DNR is? What about medical directives regarding what type of treatments a person wants or does not want? Those RIGHTS came from giving a woman the right to have an abortion.

2007-12-06 12:11:18 · answer #7 · answered by Imagine No Religion 6 · 5 3

The child wasn't punished...he was rewarded by being freed from the obligations of ever having to live, or ever feel any modicum of pain in its short existence. Given the life that such parents would have to offer him as well, death may be considered far preferrable to a life of financial instability and parents resenting you for it.

Seeing as how you undoubtably believe in an afterlife as well, they get to see Jesus sooner...how is that a bad thing? Or do you think that fetus souls line the bottom of Hell?

2007-12-06 12:20:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

I don't like abortion, but I will say this...if the baby is unwanted, which is worse for it...

To die not knowing anything of the world?

Or to live his/her life in an orphanage, waiting for someone to love him/her, wondering why they were unwanted...suffering from low self-esteem and depression, and possibly never finding a family...Maybe being bounced from foster home to foster home, being kicked out to fend for themselves at 18?

I don't have a family myself. And there are plenty of times I wish someone had aborted ME so I wouldn't be trying to work through therapy and medication for clinical depression and PTSD because I was unwanted by my parents who abused me for ten years, then abandoned me.

Forcing me to live in a loveless world was the worst punishment I've ever had to endure.

2007-12-06 12:13:48 · answer #9 · answered by Kailee 3 · 4 1

Child and baby are terms that refer to a fetus that has exited it's mothers womb.

I'd be outraged if people were killing children.

Embryos are a different matter...

Women frequently suffer miscarriages, yet very few refer to a miscarriage as a 'death in the family'. Fewer still would have a funeral service for a miscarriage. There is a reason for this. Think about it.

2007-12-06 12:13:17 · answer #10 · answered by mam2121 4 · 6 2

fedest.com, questions and answers