English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you can provide the answer, could you also provide an on-line link to prove or disprove this. I have been told that police and firefighters are NO LONGER permitted to strike because of the danger to lives. Can someone please clear this up for me?

2007-12-06 11:59:12 · 8 answers · asked by vlfranklin1999 5 in Politics & Government Law Enforcement & Police

I appreciate the info, but I REALLY NEAD A US SITE.

2007-12-06 12:44:44 · update #1

8 answers

The Police can not strike, and most Fire Department can't either. It all depends what is in their contract. The Chicago Fire Department went on strike in 1980. They no longer can.

http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1812187&lastnode_id=169667

2007-12-06 12:57:45 · answer #1 · answered by CGIV76 7 · 3 0

In CA, law enforcement and firemen are not allowed to strike. They are considered essential and if they were to leave their post, it would be illegal. There is also a no strike clause in the contract.
When no agreement is reached for a new contract, the officers still have to report to their post. In our experience, the negotiated contract is almost always retroactive.


Some jurisdictions prohibit all strikes by public employees (under such laws as the "Taylor Law" in New York). Other jurisdictions limit strikes only by certain categories of workers, particularly those regarded as critical to society: police and firefighters are among the groups commonly barred from striking in these jurisdictions. Some states, such as Michigan, Iowa or Florida, do not allow teachers in public schools to strike. Workers have sometimes circumvented these restrictions by falsely claiming inability to work due to illness — this is sometimes called a "sickout" or "blue flu." The term "red flu" has sometimes been used to describe this action when undertaken by firefighters.

It is also illegal for an employee of the United States Federal Government to strike. Prospective federal employees must sign standard form 61, an affidavit not to strike. President Ronald Reagan terminated air traffic controllers after their refusal to return to work from an illegal strike in 1981.


http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/strike/lingo.html

ETA: You're not going to find a website that generalizes this information. However, if you could get a copy of the various contracts, you'd be able to read it. You shouldn't have a problem finding a copy of the contracts since public/state jobs are involved.

2007-12-06 12:29:23 · answer #2 · answered by crimsonshedemon 5 · 2 0

The only state firefighters can strike in as of right now is Idaho. Look up labor laws state by state and you will find that most public servants can not strike in any state.

2016-03-08 08:04:28 · answer #3 · answered by Jack 1 · 2 0

Firemen Strike

2016-10-17 14:05:18 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 4 · 0 0

I can't give you the proof either, but TV Channel 5 (WEWS) in Cleveland, Ohio had a reference to that fact on the lunchtime news today. Because Ohio teachers are still allowed to strike, yet police and fire aren't. The legislature is thinking about changing the law to forbid teacher strikes as well.

2007-12-06 14:21:33 · answer #5 · answered by Dottie R 7 · 1 0

I cant provide a site, but they are not allowed to strike. They make them sign a contract saying the will not strike when they first get the job.

2007-12-07 01:59:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I can't quote you the statutes, but as I am aware the few agencies left that have 'unions' are forbidden from striking, as it would endanger the safety and welfare of the community.

I've seen the number of agencies with unions diminish over the past 30 years I've been in the business.

Unions are dead. Especially those in public safety.

2007-12-06 12:07:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Thats a good question I hope you find some valuable answers

2016-08-20 07:44:18 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers