little to no say when it comes to children and the right to life?
If a woman wants to abort her baby in a marraige or out of marraige she does not even have to consider the man? I know a Man who wanted a child he bore with a woman and she decided *no* she was getting rid of it, even though he said he would take care of it wanted nothing from her, she said *it's my body, yet his seed mattered not.
Pretty hypocritical for some here to say homosexuals should have there day yet many men and unborn children have no say? why is that? because they have no voice?
The Family I guess is a old tradition that has no meaning in such a High Technological Society where the secular screamers are the ones to call the shots huh?
2007-12-06 08:24:38 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Daniel 11:37 Neither shall he regard the God of his fathers, nor the desire of women, nor regard any god: for he shall magnify himself above all.
The above discribes the Anti-Christ but it also discribes the spirit of anti-christ.
God defines the desire of women as:
Genesis 3:16 unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; thy desire shall be thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
The deisre of women is her own husband, anything that stands against marraige between a man and woman is of the spirit of anti-christ. Including abortion.
2007-12-06 08:38:36 · answer #1 · answered by allan b 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you do not know by now the physiological, social, emotional, financial and legal repercussions of an unwanted pregnancy are different for a woman than for a man, I cannot educate you.
This is my body. No one else has any say over it.
If you did make a law that gave men the right to choose for a woman, could he also insist she have an abortion if he did not want to be a father? After all, why should he pay child support for an unwanted child? If men had a say, they could insist on an abortion. Who would pay for paternity tests? How far along in the pregnancy would she be by the time the tests were conclusive? What if those results were contested in a court of law? What about rapists? The law does not deny a rapist parental rights to his child just because that child is a product of rape. By your logic, it would be possible to forcibly breed a woman against her will, much like a farm animal. But then, the church has been in favor of that concept for years.
2007-12-06 08:36:32 · answer #2 · answered by Glee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Whoa, hold your horses. YOU do not get to speak for other people. You can only speak for yourself. I am Pro-Choice, but I do not agree with abortion for merely birth control reasons. I believe the Man should have a say in it because he helped make the child.
YOUR idea of a traditional family is just that... YOUR idea. What you consider "traditional" is not traditional in my family. And sorry to rain on your little rant parade here... but when it comes down to %'s of who considers themselves "religious" and who considers themselves "secular".... the religious outnumber the secular BY FAR. So, taking that into consideration... how the hell did abortion get legalized to begin with? I mean so many people like you complain about abortion... and then say "40 yrs ago it wasn't like this"... yet 40 yrs ago is when it was legalized. Just how did that happen????
Seems rather silly for people like you to blame "secular" people today for something that was legalized BY VOTE when most of us weren't even born!
2007-12-06 08:38:14 · answer #3 · answered by River 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Men do have equal rights. When and if a man becomes pregnant, he can have it terminated if he wants. Until then, or until it is HIS body that is directly involved, he gets no say. Once he sends his sperm elsewhere, he doesn't get to determine their fate.
As for 'unborn' children, there is no such thing.
2007-12-06 08:45:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So where is the equil rights for the woman who cannot walk away from her pregnancy when the man can?
(if you think giving 1/4 of your pay check to someone for 18 years is even close to what the woman will go through as a single mother you have another thing comming to you)
2007-12-06 08:31:52 · answer #5 · answered by Mable VT is thinking, kinda 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
how does giving homosexuals rights have ANYTHING to do with what you just talked about?
in regards to a woman aborting a child the man wants, i partially agree with you, but, the man isnt the one who has to carrie it, the woman has to put her body through 9 months of pregnancy, and all the various complications and changes that come with pregnancy, i can see why she wouldnt want to do that.
When it comes to a divorce situation, i can 100% agree, why does the mother almost always get the child even if the father is more fit to care for the child, and wants the child.
but how does this argument relate to homosexuals getting rights?
2007-12-06 08:30:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, how about this as a solution?
When they discover a way to make men pregnant, a pregnant woman who doesn't want to give birth to a child can have the embryo or zygote implanted into the man. Then he can experience 9 months of gross physical discomfort, probably resulting in an inability to work, and he can endure great pain to finally birth the child. :)
That seems about fair.
2007-12-06 08:29:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Because it is HER body...get it...it's HER body.
Yeah, I don't get it either.
There is only one way this will ever be re-thought. Let's actually make it equal rights. If a women can choose if she wants the responsibility of having a baby...then let the men have this choice too. So let's make it legal for a man to CHOOSE if he wants to support any child he has a part in creating.
You see, when abortion is legal it creates all sorts of equal rights issues. If abortion was illegal, all of those issues go away. Which is more logical?
2007-12-06 08:31:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Well yea, it is her body, the baby grows in her, its her choice whether or not to get rid of it.
If a guy ever has a baby in his belly then by all means it would be his choice whether or not to keep it...but since that hopefully will never happen it will remain a womans choice.
2007-12-06 11:50:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I celebrate the day of my miscarriage. It saved me $500.
PS) no one is calling any shots, but as long as abortion remains legal, it is legal. I want to be fixed, but my old fashioned Bible Belt doctor won't do it until I am older..."just in case I change my mind". Now, THAT is not fair. Dear, not everyone likes children. I personally hate them.
2007-12-06 08:34:17 · answer #10 · answered by goldenchilde11 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋