Kind of depends on if you take your religion straight or chase it with soda doesn't it ?
2007-12-07 10:29:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Here is the flaw in your logic. According to the Bible God ordered Noah to build an ark that would fit all the animals of the world. The dimensions were given by God. So if God said put ALL the animals on it and build it THIS BIG. Then logic says that it must have been big enough for all the animals. Therefore we can assume, through logical reasoning, that their were no dinosaurs in Noahs time. Why because they had been extinct for millions of years already.
You must also look at the fact that an ark built to the size it says in the Bible, would not be able to physically hold every single animal in the world anyways. Let alone food supplies for the time period specified in the Bible.
2007-12-06 01:53:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Matthew D 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
The flood was a local disaster that happened in Iraq, Noah was a businessman, he was not saving the world, every year he would load his barge to sell his goods, the flood happened near the end of the last ice age when a large Ice dam failed and let out a quadrillion gallons of water into the Tigris and Euphrates rivers which practically put most of Iraq under water and washed many people out to the Persian Gulf, that is Where Noah ended up drifting hopelessly for days until he landed in the southern Arabian Peninsula
2007-12-06 01:54:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It is accepted by almost everyone that Noah lived long after the dinosaurs vanished from the earth. One of the best theories for their dying out is that The environment was seriously changed when one or more huge asteroids hit the earth . Could man be next? This time the changes appear to be caused by man.
2007-12-06 01:55:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
as long as they coach the definition of concept in technology, then this is the way it is going to examine. i've got additionally in no way considered evolution provided as a reality. i've got considered the logical end of consumer-friendly descent with substitute provided in technology school rooms. the concept component is that the substitute is performed by way of organic determination. this is in no way provided as reality. No scientific concept ever is. the priority is that maximum individuals have not have been given the faintest concept of the definition of concept in technology. i think of that this can be the 1st ingredient taught to scholars earlier any of the theories. There are people who think of that theories become rules, which could no longer be farther from the actuality. There are people who think of a concept is in basic terms a wager, this is merely absurd. There are people who think of that evolution and creationism characterize a dichotomy, this is much greater absurd. The scientific training interior america is awful. this is no longer gonna get any greater helpful while maximum individuals do no longer even understand what technology is.
2016-10-01 00:01:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They haven't missed it... they just stopped laughing and will give you a response shortly. By the way, what's the explanation for there being no unicorns or fossil evidence? Couldn't Noah fit them on the arch too?
2007-12-06 02:21:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by clint 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Noah would not have to get them in the Ark as Fully Grown Dino's.
He would had accomplished this easy by Just having the Eggs of the Dino's only, this would not require any feeding only Incubation, Corcodiles Incubate their Eggs in Composte to keep them warm, I think Noah would have an easy time doing this on the Ark.
2007-12-06 01:55:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
You could have picked at least half of the answers to that question for equal ridicule. It is really sad not just how ignorant many people are, but that they are so willing to express themselves on a subject in which they are ignorant.
2007-12-06 01:57:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dendronbat Crocoduck 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually Noah probably brought the eggs of the dinosaurs on the boat, they died out because of the changes in the enviroment after the flood.
2007-12-06 01:52:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by ۞ JønaŦhan ۞ 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
I've found it's never a good idea to try to reconcile science and Christianity. The two aren't compatible.
2007-12-06 01:56:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Also--the faithful were the only ones in the boat...if the scientists were so smart, why were they not ready for the flood? I assumed they drowned as well. LOL
Why did they not know the flood was coming? Maybe because they are not as smart as they think they are.
2007-12-06 02:01:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by loveChrist 6
·
0⤊
3⤋