Also, would you all approve of this? If you don't approve, then why not?
Here is the link to the information that I typed up:
http://www.geocities.com/committed_and_sane/New_Taxation_System.doc
2007-12-05
21:03:23
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Business & Finance
➔ Taxes
➔ United States
I hate you a little bit Griffin. lol j/k
You are correct. Illegals wouldn't have bank accounts, but supposedly, politicians are wanting to give illegals drivers licenses, so if they have a drivers license, then you might as well allow them to set-up a bank account.
Or companies can hire people under the table until they are caught and are force to pay up to hundred thousand dollars in fines.
But that is a really good point. I guess the country is either going to have to make a separate plan to deport illegals, or just make them temporary citizens. I don't know what to do with illegals. The way I see it we have two choices, deport or let them stay.
2007-12-05
21:26:38 ·
update #1
Thanks Griffin and bostonia for writing a great comment to it. I have learned from this post that there are so many variables that must be looked at, removed, added, and updated that by the time you get something that works, you have a system like we have now.
I got an education from you two. Thanks again! I guess in an ideal world, this would work. If everyone would get a bank account and if all employers would pay all their employees using direct deposit, it would work. Unfortunately, the ideal world is called fantasy land, which I think about all the time.
Thanks again Griffin, and bostonia! Great post!
2007-12-05
22:24:15 ·
update #2
"it seems like it shifts a lot of the withholding burden from basically payroll departments to banks."
I wanted to respond to this. Basically, banks would have an automatic script that would do all this. I was thinking of the transaction fee that ATM machines are programmed to take from your account. So it wouldn't push any work-load onto banking staff, well except for the extra data that will be added with each deposit transaction.
But you two already pointed out several good points on why it won't work. I just wanted to through out an idea. Probably it has already been thought of before, but in case it hasn't, now all the people that think like me have learnt something.
2007-12-05
22:35:38 ·
update #3
Charlie & Angie G:
Those are very good points! I was thinking if money is taxed, when large sums of money is deposit like $500, then it wouldn't matter who you were. Most people aren't going to carry around a million dollars on them. That would be very stupid, because you are just a fool waiting to get robbed. For the past 3 weeks, in Springfield, MO, residential and store robberies are very high. So if these people knew you had a million dollars on you, then they would most likely either hurt you and take it, or if it really came to it, to get a million dollars, they wouldn't think twice about killing you for it.
So, I doubt people would keep money on them, or in there house, because there are people that would come after that money. So there would still be deposits. I think there are some people that would try to get around this tax collection solution by keeping money on them, but after they have it stolen from them once or a few times, they will make deposits in banks.
2007-12-06
17:52:32 ·
update #4