Me eat lead paent and me no hav prublems.
2007-12-05 08:26:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian A 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
there probably was but not as much as they say there is now, we are scared of a growing China and we can't do anything about them except show that they are inferior because their manufacturing has allowed lead in some toys. The Olympics are coming you know and china is spending billions they should be spending on their people on building super futuristic buildings whilke displacing millions of poor. We have more modern ways of testing for things but never underestimate the politics of things.
2007-12-05 08:14:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by funkybass4ever! 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably. Lead was a common ingredient of all paint only 20 years ago. Which is why many old houses have to be checked for lead paint before young children are allowed to live there.
2007-12-05 08:09:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by BC 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
let's see - all the kids and the dog drank from the water hose
laying in the yard - after the lizard popped out - and we are all alive today
we actually learned in school
and we could feed a family of 7 on what I pay today for
a Big Mac, Quarter Cheese, Fries, Apple pie(s) and a large drink
40 years ago you could by a super hot car - for $3500 new
those were our good ol daze
2007-12-05 08:13:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by tom4bucs 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most likely. A lot of the material used back in the day that was once considered safe are now considered to be harmful like asbestos.
2007-12-05 08:13:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by Lissa 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe that things that had lead in them is overrated. In the early seventies they became so lead focused. There was lead in paint and gasoline, but a lot of us turned have turned out alright. My Grandma, my uncles on both sides lived with lead, and coal, and they all lived to be in their late eighties and nineties. Most of it is Liberal garbage.
2015-12-10 04:18:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There was lead and asbestos. Hey, what worked for our ancestors worked for us. However in this day of air pollution and asthma our children will not be as lucky because they started out in a bad condition.
2007-12-05 08:11:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by flynntern 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Eh, i actually could ought to disagree. i think of you're only speculating one area of 'little ones' in this technology. lower back 20-30 years in the past extra little ones did no longer visit college then little ones immediately. just about each and every highschool senior in my type is going to college. additionally, the curriculum in maximum highschool instructions has bigger in subject, as properly by means of fact the variety of electives to come to a decision from. additionally, technologies. I do think of this technology of little ones has honestly an benefit by means of variations consisting of those. I do think of that youngsters immediately are being extra uncovered to drugs, alcohol, intercourse, etc beccause of the media for this reason extra vendors to appearing indecent, yet, do no longer forget approximately there are assorted little ones now that don't act as vigorously in those tactics, or do in no way. i think of we are only gazing the severe area, that's tremendously disgusting are not getting me incorrect, yet 20-30 years in the past hippies weren't the photograph of purity the two.
2016-10-10 08:19:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Probably so. But they probably didn't test things as well.
Lead poisioning from wall paint was much more the issue in the 60's and 70's.
2007-12-05 08:15:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by rltouhe 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah and it was in your water and in all of your paint too.
2007-12-05 08:08:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋