English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

With the new information out that President Bush knew Iran's nuclear weopens program was dismantled years ago, and he was warned as early as last year, should he be impeached? During all that time, he kept saying Iran was building nuclear weopens but his own intelligence service, said they weren't. This was the same situation with the war in Iraq. If an officer fails to heed sound advice from his own intelligence service, we would call that direlection of duty.

2007-12-05 07:51:47 · 15 answers · asked by mahram 2 in Politics & Government Military

15 answers

HE has not committed an Impeachable Offense!!!

Vet-USAF

You need to do some research and learn what a president can be Impeached for, use your computer for something other than TROLLING! Traitorous talk used to get you watched by the FBI. Our way of life is in trouble from being to Politically Correct!

2007-12-05 08:21:54 · answer #1 · answered by ฉันรักเบ้า 7 · 7 2

No. At lest not for the reason you gave. Remain focused on the big picture, The safety of the USA. Who cares if they put the nuclear program on hold. If so, for how long? They are patient as we are impatient. They are thinking global domination and your thinking of hiding under the temporally safe American Eagle. They think total Islamic rule, no room for other beliefs and religions. Women are 2ND class citizens at best. And if your a different sect of Islamic belief. or different from Iran's belief, Your an infidel and need to be killed, just that simple. Are you so willing to die so quickly? Let Bush error on the side of safety and security for this nation. Get out and Vote. That's a lot more important than some impeachment. Research to days political claimant and Vote

2007-12-05 08:45:29 · answer #2 · answered by igdubya 5 · 1 1

First, I'll beg to differ with Brutally Honest...In the military, service folks are not allowed to bad-mouth their superiors - including the commander-in-chief...But after discharge or retirement, freedom of speech is back on...One of the worst war time presidents in our history was Lyndon B. Johnson, who was at the helm during most of the Vietnam war...His decisions cost the lives of thousands of Americans plus untold civilians.

No, President Bush should not be impeached...Why would it even be considered - just because one doesn't like him?..The president goes on what the advisors put forth and that includes intel and supporting evidence from various agencies, both military and civilian...That is all stuff that you and I never see or hear about...All we see are the actions and the president will inform the public at an appropriate time as to what and why...The advice given to the president is just that - advice, that can be taken or rejected totally or in part...If the intel is faulty, then any decision based on that data will be faulty as well.

This CinC gave our military a job to do and then got out of the way...The commanders and leaders and troops do their jobs the way they are trained - without outside interference from the president, SecDef, press, public opinion, etc...The president takes an oath that goes - "I, (name), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."...That covers a lot of territory.

From a 15 yr Air Force Vietnam vet

2007-12-05 08:57:02 · answer #3 · answered by thud.fan 6 · 1 1

no impeachable offenses dedicated! Come on, get authentic - if he had executed something worth of being impeached, Pelosi and agency might have executed it already! i think of you're exaggerating approximately "each ex-president, ex-military, ex-flesh presser" needing Jorge Bush to be impeached!

2016-10-19 07:15:27 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

First, do us all a favor and use the "spell check" device.... you spell even worse than I do

First of all your data is wrong.....President Bush said he had no knowledge of the shut down of Iran's nuclear program until last week......the CIA verifies the President was not told until last week.

BTW...."dismantled" is NOT what the intelligence report said.....they said "shut down".....big difference.....something dismantled can not be started up again....

Just for your edification......The military was polled......a blind poll..... These are the people who know the whole story; not just what the media tells them..... the ones that are risking their lives...... 94% support the President and the war.....re-enlistments and tour extensions are at record highs

Do you think just maybe they know more than you about this war and why it must be fought???? just maybe

BTW..... You scream about how President Bush got so many troops killed
President Clinton killed more troops (519 more) during his administration......and he was not even "protecting America"......he was sticking his big nose into other countries civil wars.....not one was a threat against America

2007-12-05 08:33:10 · answer #5 · answered by Kojak 7 · 6 2

For what? President Bush has done nothing but to rely upon the intelligence resources that are given to him. Do you expect him to go check to see if they are right?

Since 2005 those resources have said that Iran is trying to build a Nuclear weapon, now over 2 years later those same resources say that they may have been wrong that Iran may have stopped building in 2003.

Yet the Iranians are still refining uranium....

Things that make ya go hmmm.

2007-12-05 07:59:07 · answer #6 · answered by SFC_Ollie 7 · 9 2

Bush knew and nobody else did? That is amazing! And Iran's leader seems so nice with the killing all the Jews and stuff. When are you moving there?
Do you really want Dick Chaney as President? I didn't think so.

P.S. There is no way this one report could be wrong, no way. All the other evidents must be wrong, it must be.

2007-12-05 08:01:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

What a stupid question, President Bush has done nothing to be impeached for, what is it with you traitors that you have to invent things just because you are so blind?

2007-12-05 08:12:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

you got two pages of info from a 140+ page report. read the rest. even the IAEA said they still had issues with iran over their program that iran still has refused to explain. like finding nuke waste in a military dump. the nuke program is supposed to be completely seperate from the civilian sector, and it is not. now the NIE 05' report said something completely different. which is valid?

2007-12-05 08:02:39 · answer #9 · answered by BRYAN H 5 · 2 2

There are laws against active duty military doing or saying anything political, so you are not likely to get any active duty military to say one way or the other how they feel about it.

2007-12-05 08:12:14 · answer #10 · answered by Al Dave Ismail 7 · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers