2007-12-05 05:51:49 · 34 answers · asked by misterman 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
why not???? they seem to invade every other country these days!! oh hold on is there any big resourses there no? out of luck then, the teddy and his group of angry men with big sticks and large knives wont have to worry!! no u.s army
2007-12-05 05:57:16 · answer #1 · answered by tellygonemad 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
No, we would be sticking our nose into British affairs if we invade Sudan for this reason. However, we should still invade Sudan for what they are doing in Darfur. Just destory the Sudanese army and get out! I will see how the skinnies commit a genocide if they are too busted up to pull a trigger.
2007-12-06 17:29:56 · answer #2 · answered by Student 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can't be serious. Of course were not going to invade Sudan for them arresting a teacher. They let the teacher go without incident.
2007-12-05 05:59:54 · answer #3 · answered by Wright 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Don't be silly.
America only invades countries with oil.
And Britain doesn't give a f*ck about invading.
We've got a little thing called 'diplomacy.' Sometimes it works. It did on this occasion.
George Bush could learn from it... and he might have to, now that the CIA have found out that Iran stopped developing nuclear weapons in 2002.
I wonder what premis he's going to use if he wants to make war on Iran now? It can't be supporting Al Qaeda, old bin Laden isn't welcome in Iran either. It can't be weapons of mass destruction either.
2007-12-09 05:11:39 · answer #4 · answered by Beastie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no need to propose such an outrageous course of action.
If America were to get involved it would cost countless British lives... by friendly fire mostly!
Far better to get the sensible people of Sudan and all their religious factions together, then along with the president of America and his advisers around a negotiating table... get talking!
This would give the British exactly what they desperately need, a concentrated target for a 100 megaton warhead.... Job done!
2007-12-05 06:33:36 · answer #5 · answered by hawkeye 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It has nothing to do with America.. Nor does it have any involvement within a military status.
She broke the law in their eyes, and nothing could have been done to stop it if negotiation did not occur.
2007-12-06 04:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by Nick.391 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She wasn't arrested last week, she was convicted last month and released this week. Why would we The British can handle that on their own if it was needed; she was a British citizen not an American. Should really read the whole story in the news.
2007-12-05 06:04:17 · answer #7 · answered by GunnyC 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Have you ever heard of concentration of force? Spraying our military all over the world at every excuse for seven years is why this thing in Iraq keeps dragging on and has cost billions. It would have simple to declare war on the Taliban and Al Queda in 2001 and focus three good divisions with marines and special forces and air support with the orders to hunt them down.... In Afastigian and the Pakistan border. The shotgun approach of attacking every group of militant Muslims has not worked very good so far..... And I am tired of every red hot Bush fanatic trying to say it has or sulking...Face it dude your boy isn't much of a military genius.
2007-12-05 06:06:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
N O, That is England's problem, not the United States of America!!
2007-12-05 06:04:46 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
OLD NEWS!!
The teacher was British and she has already been released and deported back to the United Kingdom, please do some basic research before posting a question
2007-12-05 07:12:37 · answer #10 · answered by conranger1 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
How are America involved?
2007-12-05 05:54:57 · answer #11 · answered by Funky Little Spacegirl 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋