I was asking this question in Low & Ethics section but it seams lawyers consider it to belong more to philosophic field. So I ask it here as well. Any opinion will be appreciated. Thank you.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApoqCaoq97i9o_mma9hZO1Xsy6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071205073859AAov3rj
2007-12-05 02:58:25 · 6 answers · asked by Even Haazer 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Two Things MT
First this is the same question with different wording (Newton's Laws) as you have already posted here so why ask the same question twice.
Second the legal eagles said philosophical not theological!
So try putting it there, though they will either not answer or they'll rip your thinking to pieces
but try if you want!
2007-12-05 03:43:39 · answer #1 · answered by Sly Fox [King of Fools] 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They couldn't respond because you can't grasp the difference between science and civil law. (It's a common problem for people in authority-based religions.) Scientific "laws" are simply statements of what has been observed a posteriori about the universe. They are dependent on the observations, not dictates of scientific institutions. Civil and criminal law is arbitrarily established to bring some kind of order to human interations in a society. It can be done a variety of ways and is dependent on civil authority for its validity, not the behavior it controls. You're comparing apples and oranges.
As to your contentions about the laws of motion, you can't even tell the difference between cosmology and biogenesis so I doubt you're very serious about your question. In the case of the Big Bang, the mass and energy have been constant all along. When concentrated in a singularity, they would be subject to another scientific "law": entropy. Concentrated matter, energy, pressure, voltage, whatever, would tend to seek equilibrium with its surrounding area. Objects in motion or at rest tend to stay in that state UNLESS acted on by another force, such as a difference in pressure with the surrounding area. The spreading out wasn't even because the pressure wasn't even. (Otherwise we wouldn't be discussing anything.) But overall, matter and energy has been expanding at a rate consistent with scientific theory. Your question might properly be how all that matter and energy came to be in one singularity to begin with, but your answer would be no more of an explanaition than any other.
2007-12-05 03:29:39 · answer #2 · answered by skepsis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question is more of a silly rant. That is probably why you are not getting many answers that you like.
Also, do not believe that lawyers are sitting around waiting to hand out free legal advice in the Law and Ethics section. They want to be paid for their services. Do not treat answer you receive from there are legal advice.
2007-12-05 03:03:12 · answer #3 · answered by A.Mercer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lawyers didn't respond because the first qualification to be a lawyer is an ability to use logic, and your question was devoid of any logic. Notwithstanding your use of the word "low" instead of "law," you failed to say what evolution has to do with Newton's law, how evolution goes against those laws, why this would be in court, and what evolution has to do with the origin of the universe.
2007-12-05 03:07:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They suryly have to know what the current legal philosophies of the court etc. But you take legal glasses in college to get there, so it's a "legal" field.
2007-12-05 03:03:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
there are a number of forces ALWAYS acting, gravitation, weak nuclear force, strong nuclear force, magnetics, ALWAYS acting...
2007-12-05 03:05:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋