called The SPIRIT OF GOD.
THE SPIRIT OF GOD is like an invisible river , a ever flowing stream of force moving in all direction and back and ever expanding all at the same time and all the time
Gravity is a "Pushing Force" that uphold all His creations in it's proper place.
Time is also from this Source, except that it is moving slower than the Space (also an invisible flowing force), while matter are moving slower than time.
But all these are bathe in the Source - God unseen Spirit as described in Genesis 1- The Spirit of God hovering over the deep.
So any Scientists can make sense of what I just says outside of the Box (School of Physics and Scientific world)
What say you all who are thinking "inside the Box"
2007-12-05
02:04:49
·
16 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Just an ordinary layman who believed in Word of God as the final authority and not Science.
2007-12-05
02:07:18 ·
update #1
Acid Zebra, I can also laugh at your Theory that Gravity is a "Pulling force" as there are no conclusive evidences that it is a "pulling" and not a "pushing" pressure.
2007-12-05
02:12:02 ·
update #2
I submit to you that the "Unified Theory" that you guys are searching for is the Ever Presence-Omnipresence, Omnipotent and Omniscience Creator God . How else can you explained His Creation?
2007-12-05
02:20:13 ·
update #3
the..revo.., there is no such a thing as vacuum don't you know?
2007-12-05
02:22:40 ·
update #4
Paul.., sorry , I think you misunderstood me. You scientific people are thinking inside the BOX is what I meant to says . The BOX was reserved for you always and forever until God opens your eyes to see outside the your BOX!
Did you get it this time?
2007-12-05
02:29:40 ·
update #5
rashad K.., Thanks for the consolation ! You really think so? that will make the mad scientists ever madder (pardon the vernacular).
I am glad that you do see. Those who think themselves wise will be in for a very BIG surprise when the Truth is known, that I'm sure?
I know Whom I've believed and am committed to Him until "That Day" What about you?
2007-12-05
02:36:01 ·
update #6
togethr.. I just know, I don't have to know why; just like Gravity I just know it is there, as God would have it and He can removes it anytime if He want and He don't have to explained to me when He does for whatever reason He deems fit.
That all fine with me! I have 100% faith and confidence in my God. How about you?
2007-12-05
02:41:39 ·
update #7
revo.. I am no expert but what I know is this: Everything and all things are created by Him . He - The WORD - Who was made Flesh; is that Creative forces that some Scientist refers to as so Ethereal field (but He is all that and more)
Whether it is the Ethereal Field; Gravity;Space;Time;Matter; Sub-Atomic; etc they are all subjected to the Creator.
Food for thoughts:
Matter not only comes from the Ethereal Field but also is defined by the Field (And remember God is all that and more - the Bible say it this way; "All things were created by Him and In Him all things consist" In other words, He is way way beyond creations which we are told is continueingly expanding. Have any one ask the question Why?
Can we say, the Creative fields (including the Ether/Gravity/Space/Matters/Sub Atomic, ETC) be named the "mother field" and they all comes from God - the "Father Field ?
Therefore, the Ether Field, Gravity or Space can exist without Matter, matter would perish without the Ether Field.
2007-12-05
20:26:13 ·
update #8
And, of course, God exists without the "mother field" but the "mother field" would collapse without HIS Sustaining Power - The Bible says, God uphold the World with HIS WORD
Now can you believe my Father God ?
2007-12-05
20:28:24 ·
update #9
What if I tell you Gravity is also Time and Time is Gravity?
2007-12-09
02:32:57 ·
update #10
Peace!
I say great understanding and excellent Logic, but more importantly you are absolutely RIGHT!
2007-12-05 02:10:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by rashad_khalifa 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ok, well, when an atom of matter (lets say hydrogen) and an atom of antimatter (hydrogen with opposite charged particles) collide in space, a huge amount of energy is released but nothing is left over. so the space being occupied by the atoms causes a temporary vacuum, now with 2 atoms the vacuum and the explosion would not be very large,but if a small mass of antimatter collided with an enormous mass of matter (900% more) the resulting collision would force the excess mass to be drawn into the vacuum area previously occupied by the antimatter. and with all that heat and energy at the core, the molten moving metal (if the atoms were mostly metal) would form a magnetic field around that planet protecting it from solar winds. With a few more encounters from cosmic travellers, you could eventually have the right recipe for a life sustaining planet. And thats the beginning of time for earth.
Man, its really far fetched, but what do ya think?
2007-12-05 02:17:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say you don't understand gravity, for one thing. Gravity is a pulling force, not a pushing force. Gravity is a force of attraction, not repulsion.
Then, I'd say you don't know the difference between philosophy and science. Science and religion really have no beef, because they are seperate areas of study. That is, in fact, one of the issues that come from things like Intelligent Design. You can't compare science and religion, because they are fundementally different. Science has certain rules of application that don't fit with religious study. Philosophy is the area that religion belongs, and that's why there is discord when people try and move their philosophy into the area of science. Kind of like trying to figure out how to build a house by studying agriculture...
2007-12-05 02:12:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Night Owl 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It has been postulated that one single force or principle or law is responsible for all the known forces and matter in the universe, however, to describe it as 'god's spirit' does not tell us anything. It is the same as if you said that the single thing responsible for everything in the universe was, "Xanthoo". What does that mean? It means nothing and says nothing. Get it? To describe something that accounts for all the forces in the universe you must also explain what it is, what it does, and how it works, not just say "its THIS".
2007-12-05 02:15:16
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I use only the Bible to tell me what to think, becasue only what God says that matters.
These things do all come to us from God, who seems invisible , but for those who find Him, the can Hear from Him, see Him, speak of HIm, in the SPirit.
All around us are the prooves of God, but men tend to deny it and insist on more proof God has nothing to prove to anyone. WE either have faith to believe and then He will show us, or we wont have faith. That is the choice each person must make, for God or against Him, and only one way to get to God, thru the shed blood of Jesus Christ.
God knew just how to hang the starts, the sun and the moon, to create the mountains, rivers, valleys, streams, and the vast oceans, all those testify of Him
But GOd wont make you see it. its choice. He forces noone.
Time is nothing to God, He is time, He is everything. He made it all and it all belongs to Him, and we who will answer His call to love and obey Him, and follow Jesus as our personal saviour, will be able to enjoy in these things together with God.
I pray that for you all.
God bless you again.
2007-12-06 05:28:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by full gospel shirley 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think that your undertaking is only loss of expertise. undergo with me and please study my finished answer and then think of roughly what i've got pronounced in the previous you respond, something i do no longer continually do myself. Scientists have hypothesized, in string theory and M-theory, that the Universe has the two 11 or 26 dimensions. The variety of measurement relies upon on which form of the universe or symmetry theory you like, symmetry (11 dimensions)or large symmetry (26 dimensions). If one is thoroughly purpose, the scientist does not choose the two one, in spite of the undeniable fact that that's extra handy and much less innovations-blowing to do handle only 11 dimensions. which skill there are could be a minimum of 7 dimensions that all of us recognize little or no approximately. I' admit that i'm working in something of a records vacuum myself right here, yet i do no longer see why various of of those seven better dimensions won't be able to be temporal or non secular dimensions. in keeping with probability on the subatomic quantum scale of length there's various of temporal dimensions. that should describe most of the plain paradoxes, like how 2 appreciably spatially separated debris can "transmit" education/records at doubtless swifter than easy speeds. Say that to boot to the three spatial dimensions we expect of we are common, there are truly 3 temporal dimensions, That makes six measurement, no longer 4. in keeping with probability various of of those last 5 dimensions is expertise, Arbitrarily, lets say there 3 dimensions of expertise. What are the relax 2 dimensions. For loss of expertise and absence of yet another much less emotionally charged observe, why won't be able to the relax 2 dimensions in an 11 measurement universe be non secular or "magic" dimensions" Ugg the caveman could have theory that the technologies we've immediately is magic. there are situations whilst i'm only mentally surprised that the RNA cloned human insulin I take six situations an afternoon for the final year and counting became into finished technological understanding fiction 40 5 years in the past whilst famous individual Trek TOS premiered. in keeping with probability 4 uncomplicated forces is all that are needed to maintain an 11 measurement Universe. Physics = God is useful.
2016-10-10 07:40:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by cozza 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say that what you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
2007-12-05 02:15:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I say: All things arise due to causes and conditions, are changing and impermanent. There's no finite beginning to time, nor a finite end. The moment of "now" is created by the moment before it, same as the moment of your MIND now being created by the moment of mind before, and the concept of an omnipotent creator being is illogical.
_()_
2007-12-05 02:12:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
People used to say the sun was god...you're suggesting the same thing but updated slightly...hum i think that puts you firmly in the box. is it cozy in there?
2007-12-07 01:18:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say, show that your idea reproduces general relativity in the low energy limit, calculate the first order corrections, then we'll talk.
2007-12-08 19:44:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by KH 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ya that could be true...or you could look at this with logic and realize you are just labeling things as god's doing because of your faith.
2007-12-05 02:13:05
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋