English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Surely to accept God as your creator and Judge and then to say that Jesus wasn't God's son is quite blasphemous.

He was the Son of God and the Son of Man all at once, God incarnate, yet people deny that Jesus was God's son or God made man.

Don't mean to cause arguments or cause anyone any offence, would just like anyone else's take on this.

You are entitled to your own views on religion and otherwise just keep it clean!

Just sort of came to me now.

2007-12-05 00:45:51 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

God is God, whatever label of religion you put on Him, you can call Him Allah, Lord, Father, whatever, He is still the creator and therefore the same God.

Pretty much all religions follow the same God - Just wish we could all get along instead of fighting over minor differences.

I'm not saying you're all sinners cos you don't believe what I do, I'm not really sure how I feel about it, it was just a random thought for the day!

2007-12-05 01:08:55 · update #1

Jana - God does not call anyone His son incarnate does He?!

Abraham was a follower and so were a lot of people in the Bible that God spoke to. We are all children of God in that respect but it is made obvious in the Bible that Jesus is God incarnate and therefore His son. Were any of the others born as part of a miracle virgin birth?

Did any of the others die for us to save us from our sins?

2007-12-05 01:13:03 · update #2

14 answers

I don't see how someone can read the Bible, believe in the God that it talks about, but not accept the part of it that talks about Jesus. Jesus is "God's Son", but in reality He is an aspect of God Himself.

This is the essence of the Trinity. There is one God, but three parts to Him... Kind of like an egg. There is the white, the yolk and the shell, but one egg, and each needs the other and is part of the other. There is one God and He is one person, but there are three parts to Him - the 'Father', the 'Son', and the 'Holy Spirit'. In reality, these are just names we give them to identify what part of the Trinity we are referring to.

Jesus is God incarnate, yes. This simply means that He is God in physical form. How can a person 'accept' God but not His 'Son'? This is ultimately rejecting God Himself anyway.

2007-12-05 00:52:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Jesus is no different than the rest of us (children of God). We are all God incarnate, but most don't want to accept that. Jesus was showing us what we could be...not to be worshipped and put on a high (unreachable) pedastle.

I accept God, and Jesus - but not in the same way as the orthodoxy.

~ Eric Putkonen

2007-12-05 01:00:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To accept Jesus as God is a Christian concept. Are you saying that non-Christians are blasphemous. Blasphemy has to do with verbal abuse of the name of God or using God's name in vain. In ancient Egypt there was a title 'the king's son'. It was a title of honor that the king bestowed on a faithful minister. It was not uncommon in the Hebrew Bible for someone to be listed as a son of a great man or a prophet who was not in fact his biological son. Sometimes a disciple was listed as a son even though he was not biologically related.

2007-12-05 00:56:57 · answer #3 · answered by Barry W 4 · 0 0

God does not have a Son period!!! having a son would bring him to the level of man...which He is not....and at the same time say he is God incarnate..if u think logically..he's gotta be one person..not both..there is no two in one

“…How can He have a son when He has no consort?...” (Quran 6:101)

“Son of God” is metaphorical and, as with christos, doesn’t imply exclusivity. After all, The Oxford Dictionary of the Jewish Religion confirms that in Jewish idiom “Son of God” is clearly metaphorical. To quote, “Son of God, term occasionally found in Jewish literature, biblical and post-biblical, but nowhere implying physical descent from the Godhead.”[1]

And in any case, the list of candidates for “son of God” begins with Adam, as per Luke 3:38: “...Adam, which was the son of God.”

Those who rebut by quoting Matthew 3:17 (“And suddenly a voice came from heaven, saying, ‘This is My beloved son, in whom I am well pleased’”) have overlooked the point that the Bible describes many people, Israel and Adam included, as “sons of God.” Both II Samuel 7:13-14 and I Chronicles 22:10 read, “He (Solomon) shall build a house for My name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. I will be his Father, and he shall be My son.”

So i beg to differ... this was all made up by the church poor interpretation if u ask me of the language that Jesus Preached in which was jewish

2007-12-05 01:05:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jana 2 · 0 1

The Catholic Church would not have self belief "that God the mummy is Mary" The Catholic Church believes that the Blessed Virgin Mary is a individual who grew to become the mummy of Jesus Christ, God the Son, and for this reason on a similar time as human could be noted as the mummy of God. Is your mom the mummy of your human physique or your soul or the two? Or is she merely your mom? even however you have been finally created by way of God (the two physique and soul), your mom remains your mom. this is using fact your mom gave start to a individual, who has the two a physique and a soul. interior a similar way, the Blessed Virgin Mary is the mummy of Jesus Christ. Christians have self belief that Jesus Christ is a divine individual who possesses 2 natures, one human and one divine. using fact Jesus is the 2nd individual of the Holy Trinity, God the Son, and Mary is his organic and organic mom, it logically flows that Mary could be noted as the mummy of God even however she isn't divine. this is equivalent to a commoner who marries a king and could become the mummy of the subsequent king. She is entitled to the call of Queen and mom of the King even however she isn't royalty. no one 2 hundred, or 1000 years in the past could have been perplexed approximately those words. yet this is complicated for individuals to understand in those situations the place royalty and kings and queens are few and much between. With love in Christ.

2016-09-30 22:02:40 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I dont think it is blasemous. But i do think you wont go to heaven. God is perfect and cannot look at sinful beings, such as you and i. So by accepting his son, the sinless child of God, God can now look at you as he sees his son and sees you as sinless. His son paid the price so that we can have relationship with God. Without Jesus we cannot have this.

2007-12-05 00:54:19 · answer #6 · answered by kellythetrainer 3 · 1 0

No not really, whos to say they are talking about the same god you are? Just because some people believe in one god, and others another, doesn't make it wrong. It's just what they were brought up to believe. As long as it makes them happy believeing what they want, who am I to say their wrong?

2007-12-05 00:50:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Meditate on this. God will tell you if it's blasphemous or not. Don't listen to your own opinion, but listen for God. Conversations are two way deals.

2007-12-05 00:49:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you do not believe in the trinity does that automatically mean you don't accept Jesus ?

2007-12-05 00:50:12 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Once I was a little that way myself, much to my shame. After years of investigation I have corrected that fatal error

2007-12-05 00:51:01 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers