English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

The man lied to the people of this country and he still lies to this day. Time and time again has show that he does nothing but ask for more time to try to cover up his lies in Iraq. Its sad that you would put your party first and try to help him cover up his lies, all the while our troops are taking a pounding from this mans lies. What part of LIE, do you not understand rep cons and others that voted for him, or should I say the farsk way we vote or dont vote.


Below are facts...

Back slid'n all the way up the hill G Bush?
"History teaches us that underestimating the words of evil, ambitious men is a terrible mistake," Bush said. "Bin Laden and his terrorist allies have made their intentions as clear as Lenin and Hitler before them. And the question is, will we listen?"


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071101/ap_o...


If I am not mistaken, Bin Laden is not a threat to the US. So why on earth would G Bush use him like this?


Just goes to show how much this man is a lier!

Somebody prove me wrong please, come on cons rep, answer the question...

Did he just not lie to the world? To his country? To his fellow man?

Yes or No?

If War Denial is dangerous, then Bin Laden must be a threat! It would be nice if this so called man made up his mind for the better of our troops!

Sorry Bas;lkj;

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApTO.2oRecZ_GY0sB6b3LATQ7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071101150937AAd7Fuc

I posted a question on yahoo Q/A form


Sending it to you if you want to use it, feel free.

2007-12-04 23:45:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

This question should be in the joke section. Anyone that still believes Bush is doing a good job is ignorant and has their head in the sand! If Bush truly cared about our national security, he would have had our borders secured by 2002. He has made more terrorists than he has eliminated! This country is so divided and headed into the wrong direction. If Bush would have secured the borders and spent the money domestically, that he has spent on the war, our infrastructure would have been rebuilt, our schools improved, 5000+ American military still alive, etc etc!
You Bush supporters need to read newspapers even if Bush doesn't. I'm no Republican or Democrat! I'm an American!

2007-12-04 23:24:37 · answer #2 · answered by G Y 3 · 2 1

Bush reflects the worst aspects of the American people. Unfortunately, the worst are in the majority right now. Only when he trashes our economy does anyone here care about foreign policy or anything besides their precious money - the goobers would kill anyone and everyone if it kept the cash flowing in. When the rest of the world stops trading with the U.S. due to their greed and malice, then you'll see a turnaround. But we're not all alike, and not all of us elected Bush - I for one voted against him twice. I knew he'd be bad for the country, but I never imagined arrogance and stupidity on such a massive scale - this is the pits. The weak economy, the death toll in Iraq, the racism, the environmental damage, the assault on the middle class, the usurpation of power, the cronyism - we on the left are like kids in a candy store, unable to select a favorite from so many choices...

2007-12-05 00:16:39 · answer #3 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 0 1

I think Mr.Bush is doing a pretty good job. Their are some things that I disagree with,but then again the same thing i had with ones that I didn't vote for.
In the last 2 voting cycles,there really was no choice offered by the Democrats. I won't vote for someone who thinks that trashing their apponent is more important than telling me what thir going to do for the Nation as a whole.
No doubt this cycle is shaping up to be the same old stupid playbook infintile garbage.

2007-12-04 23:22:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Because 1/2 of us had the good sense to not vote for Al Gore or John Kerry. Bush may not be that great, but he is way better than either of those two guys (especially Gore).

2007-12-04 23:03:32 · answer #5 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 4 2

It doesn't really matter who is president some will love him, some will hate him and some will be ambivelent. We are in a new election campaign and the one who can convince the most people to vote for him will be the next president - for better or worse.

2007-12-04 23:07:35 · answer #6 · answered by denise m 2 · 3 3

President Bush is a great leader, we Americans are lucky to have him. We elected him twice. He is doing a fine job.

2007-12-04 23:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

Bush replace into chosen by using the Republican leaders on the time. between the magazines that I examine talked approximately him because of the fact the "Golden Boy." while he ran for place of work the 1st time, he had pots of money with which to run his campaign. because of the fact the staggering Republicans have been conscious that George replace into no longer too incredible (a minimum of i'm hoping they have been attentive to that) they observed to it that he replace into surrounded by using adult males who had labored for his father. His campaign replace into run by using Karl Rove and it replace into relatively the 1st time a huge deal replace into made up of the "non secular proper" which i think of replace into quite often to blame for his win (purely my opinion for sure). Altho he's the worst president i think of we've ever had, I ought to confess that he's likeable sufficient. Why he replace into re-elected is previous me yet my mom is an occasion of the intelligence of somewhat some the voters (sorry mom); she voted for him because of the fact "there's a conflict occurring." properly, duh! additionally, I and somewhat some different Democrats weren't all that loopy approximately John Kerry even tho I did vote for him. most of the inhabitants nonetheless believed Bush and could no longer have faith that he were deceptive (mendacity) us, and actual everyone else, on the subject of the could desire to circulate to conflict. Heck, even now a minimum of 25% of the country nonetheless approves of him. needless to say, those ought to be people who are not into analyzing or staring at information stations. As for making relaxing of him; you and different international places are actually not the only ones. Our comedy shows have been doing it for his finished presidency and somewhat effectively i might upload. 2 books have been revealed re "Bushisms." i might relatively opt to verify them yet am unwilling to spend the money.

2016-10-19 06:01:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush is maybe good for some American people but for rest of world he mean DEAD.
Kick Bush in the ***!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-12-04 23:09:19 · answer #9 · answered by kohen 1 · 2 2

why don't the liberals run some decent people who can win elections hey I'm a independent

2007-12-04 23:03:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers