English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Between he and Rodham Clinton, it is hard to tell who is worse.

2007-12-04 21:35:00 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

3 answers

Actually Cheney is on a roll.

And the Clinton's could only damage our country and foreign affairs and relations.

Democracy should be a way of life for everyone.

Except for those who abuse it!

2007-12-05 05:18:53 · answer #1 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 1 0

" Cheney is a bit crooked, but the Clintons are crooked in every way. A disgraceful blot on a country like USA. "

2007-12-05 06:46:55 · answer #2 · answered by Din2600 2 · 2 0

when you compare the alternative of the harry reid unilateral surrender, no im not tired of it, its the correct thing to do. and as far as which one is worse. if you even bother to consider what hillary clinton was a part of during her husbands presidency, its a foregone conclusion.

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-12-05 05:59:52 · answer #3 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers