I bleed Chicago... I am a die-hard fan for each team... just want to know what y'all think.
2007-12-04 18:25:03 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
Cubs no doubt.
Cubs over Bulls.
Wrigley over United Center.
Baseball over basketball.
Nothing but respect for Jordan, but come on...we're talking about the Cubs!
2007-12-05 02:22:36 · answer #1 · answered by JenEstes 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the Chicago Cubs are more the historic fancise then the Chicago Bulls. They have played longer in it the city of Chicago, plus thier stadium Wrigley Field is way older then the United Center, but in the coming year, both teams will hit a decade long drought. It will be 100 years since the Chicago Cubs last won the World Series, and it will be 10 years since the Chicago Bulls last won an NBA championship. And I know that they have enjoyed championships sooner then the Chicago Cubs have, and the Bulls got 6 of them in the 90's, and may have been the only time that they have been good, or even in my lifetime. Will either of these teams end thier drought, more likely not for either of these teams.
2007-12-05 17:34:21 · answer #2 · answered by staggmovie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is an ez one... Cubs. They have been around since the late 1870's. 1876 I think, but I could be wrong. The Bulls are all modern day hype cuz of Jordan. I'm not saying that's not amazing, they DID make thier mark, but as #1 answerer said... even I would love to see a Cubs champion rather than another Bulls. I've actually predicted the Cubs to win any year when Wood and Prior are both healthy. 2003 would have been it if not for Bartman. However, they are on the right track and I still say Cubs in 2008 over the Yanks in the series.
Winter meetings have made me rethink this, but there is plenty of time left and it would be stupid to count the Yanks out w/ all the talent they have and all the time left to make deals.
Final answer Cubs > Yanks in 6. The final curse broken.
2007-12-05 03:31:32 · answer #3 · answered by Legends Never Die 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cubs... and it's not even close.
The Bulls (1966) are a relative new kid on the block in Chicago, far behind the baseball White Sox (1901) and Cubs (1902), the football Bears (1919), and hockey Blackhawks (1926).
2007-12-05 02:54:52 · answer #4 · answered by [z]ther 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pre Jordan the Chicago Bulls were like the worst franchise in basketball, The Cubs have a long history of being losers especially while the Bulls are nuevo riche or whatever
2007-12-05 05:16:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since you are asking this in the baseball section, people will lean towards the Cubs. Both the Cubs and the Bulls are historic but there is more charm, if less success to the denizens of Wrigley.
2007-12-05 04:23:05 · answer #6 · answered by Justin T 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definately the Cubs
the Bulls may have had Jordan, but the Cubs have/had:
1. Wrigley Field
2. Tinkers to Evers to Chance (HOF double play combo)
3. Ernie Banks ("let's play two")
4. Harry Caray
5. Fergie Jenkins
6. Ryne Sandberg
2007-12-05 02:53:21 · answer #7 · answered by deadhead (Who Dat Nation) 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Cubs franchise has been around since 1876, the Bulls have been in existence for 40 years.
This is a no-brainer, the Cubs have much more history.
.
2007-12-05 02:39:44 · answer #8 · answered by Kris 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I think its the Cubs. They go wayyyyyy back. Even though Chicago is known for Jordan, the Cubs defiatley go farther back. I think people would rather see a Cubs WS then a Bulls Championship. am i right?
2007-12-05 02:29:05 · answer #9 · answered by Cody K 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
anyone from chicago would know its the bears, cubs, then take your pick after that.
people talk more about ditka and he is more popular than jordan, (partly because he still talks and has restaurants in chicago) and the fact that he gave the bears their first super bowl. even though jordan was a huge part of six rings.....thats how much bear football is to chicago....the cubs 2nd, because of its long history and list of players, not to mention the drought of not winning a WS.
2007-12-05 08:02:55 · answer #10 · answered by sebastian 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋