If I'm hot and poor, at least I have the raw materials to become hot and rich...
2007-12-04 17:00:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by rosbif 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
After going through years of not having it, I'd much rather be ugly and rich. Rich people have the resources to look good, whether nature gave it to them or not, so if it really bothered me, I could do something about it! Besides, you're only hot for so long. In time, outside beauty dies off, and then you're still poor!
I'm not self absorbed, either, but sometimes I wish I had the means to not have to struggle all the time, ya know?
2007-12-05 01:46:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many ugly rich people do you see that are sooooooo attractive within society?
Has anyone ever called Hugh Heffner ugly? I never heard of it. Hot and ugly can only be determined by each individual mind that perceives it and makes judgement on either.
Therefore I'd choose to be ugly and financially rich because its only you who has made that judgement so far...
2007-12-05 01:05:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by honesthustler 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either one because you have an advantage and a disadvantage in both but as Christ said "blessed are the poor" for they are rich in spirit and those eternal things are truly what matter if you think about it. So I am leaning towards hot and poor.
2007-12-05 01:04:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by believefaithfulhopeful 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd choose to be ugly and rich...
With my wealth, I'd do whatever it takes even go through plastic surgery to become handsome...
I can also use my wealth to help the poor, provide employment for the unemployed, do good, ... etc. and yeah, live the kind of life I wanna live... B-)
2007-12-05 01:05:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by ej974 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd rather be hot and poor because I can always marry some rich sap and get rich. If I was ugly, it would be forever and there are somethings that money couldn't fix with surgery.
for example, donatella versace:
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/09_03/donatellaBIG_669x800.jpg
2007-12-05 01:03:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by tieveasilona 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
probably hot and poor, coz then you could go upwards from there, and become hot and rich. and you'd get friends easily. or you might be a lil intimidating...who knows?
whereas, if you're ugly and rich, there's only 2 reasons a person would be attracted to you, and thats: you're rich, or that you managed to have a killer attractive personality. but its probably coz you're rich. so you'd never know why ANYbody hung out with you. or you'd know, and resent them for being shallow people.
2007-12-05 01:02:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by need 2 get a grip 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Neither.
I'd rather be intelligent and charming; besides that'd do me much more good in the long run. Looks fade and money gets spent. But if you have the cleverness and the charm, you could always come out on top.
2007-12-05 01:23:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
either one can work for you. but i think ugly and rich is less effortless, especialy for guys since women are naturally drawn to money.
i have the unfortunite circumstance of being ugly and poor. that doesn't get you a whole lot of anything but rejection.
2007-12-05 01:35:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by Joshua's Dhrama 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hot and poor because at least I could possibly marry rich. Then I will be hot and rich.
2007-12-05 01:02:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lovely H 3
·
2⤊
1⤋