I think you got it right with your first reason - they see so many films that they get burned out. So many films have the same plot that it must get tiresome to see the same thing all the time.
2007-12-04 16:05:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jeff H 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
i do not somewhat imagine critics be counted. most of the time, if someone needs to work out a movie, they'll see it regardless of the critic's opinion. Transformers change into beloved by ability of 19% of all critics in accordance to rottentomatoes, yet it is going to likely be the optimal grossing action picture this 12 months. even although i imagine the outcomes are small on a movie with undesirable comments, i imagine if a movie receives large comments, it may help human beings learn about it. examine out Slumdog Millionaire. It made just about one hundred fifty million money contained in the U.S. If it hadn't been nominated for (and gained) fantastic photo, I especially doubt it will be able to make a third of that. i appreciate some video clips the critics hate, and that i hate some video clips the critics love, yet overall, i imagine they do a sturdy pastime.
2016-10-25 11:39:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think in some cases they are intentionally out of touch with the common folk, because they think the common intellect needs to be "elevated" and that they are somehow qualified to do that. I'm not justifying or condoning that, but you didn't mention this. In fact, sometimes it seems they are intentionally contradictory to public opinion whether in favor of or opposed to a film, simply to be contradictory. And different critics serve different purposes. Some film critics are judging the "art" of the picture; others are deciding its entertainment value for the masses; still others are judging its performances. I think all of the reasons you've stated are valid, too, except perhaps for the "overly objective", because it seems to be they are overy subjective, sometimes in the worst possible way!
2007-12-04 15:59:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by minfue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Critics have very different taste from general audiences, and have different expectations of films.
For instance, "Transformers" (2007) was not critically acclaimed, though some critics gave it a positive review.
Meanwhile, audiences loved the movie, and, for a period of time, it was the highest rated film on Yahoo! Movies.
2007-12-04 15:56:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
They are artists in their own right. They know what quality film is all about. Most of them are highly-intelligent (probably the reason why the vast majority doesn't get their ideas).
2007-12-04 16:00:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I simply believe that after a point they believe their own critiques are the publics opinion. It is a pitfall of being a critic of anything. objectivity is gone.
2007-12-04 15:56:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by nutsfornouveau 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
i learned this the hard way because i tried to apply to be a movie reviewer and was turned down because i told if people would like it-
you are not supposed to say if other people would like it, just if you liked it.
2007-12-05 06:14:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by zero 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
their critque is just done on a different scale. Peopletend to critque with different views and they have set points that have to be answered and considered they have a list of these points we dont
2007-12-04 16:00:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dee 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Arrogance.
2007-12-05 01:33:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by DR W 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
You pretty much answered your own question. You win.
2007-12-04 15:55:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chris M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋