OJ SiMPSON?

Question

does anyone think OJ did it ?

Answer 1

He absolutely did the deed. His actions since then have not been those of a man grieving for his loss or outraged at the crime. They've been of a man 1) trying to avoid the police; 2) trying to blame everyone else; 3) hiding behind his race; 4) enjoying the fame that came from the trial; 5) outraged at the system and not at the supposed perpetrator; 6) spending all of his time looking for the supposed killer on America's golf courses.

He's the guy. No need to look any farther for Ron and Nicole's killer.

Answer 2

why are people so obsessed with this man.

did he do what? go to a hotel and reclaim his stolen goods.
why are people overlooking the fact that his items were stolen and they were about to sell it.

ron goldman's dad and sister set the whole thing up. they have been bitter for thirteen years about their son/brother death, they are willing to committ a crime to have him put behind bars. will this bring ron back, no!

and how can one cripple man kill two people. they say nicole died first, so what ron do just stand there and watch this man stab nicole to death. he was a 25 year old male that worked out everyday, why didn't he try to confront or fight oj. hell why did he not run.

nicole and ron were killed by professional hit men. did you forget she had a drug problem. she could have owed money, who knows. but a person just don't commit murder (who has never killed anyone, and just move on with his life) there are no reports that he is a sociopath or psychopath.

people move on and get over it, he was aquitted because he did not do it. meanwhile the real killer runs free.


everything RoVale you say is circumstantial. there could be a numerous answers to your questions. he ran because he knew that he was going to be the number one suspect. how can you expect to convict someone off some shoe print (was that the only shoe ever sold) and some gloves. and let me remind you that the glove did not fit. how do you know how he reacted to hearing that she was dead. only by reports from others. they have been divorced long before she was murdered. she was a freaking drug addict. she owed money. that was a hitman m.o. why would he kill the mother of his children at her house with his children there. what kind of guard dog was that, remember she was roaming around in the alley lost. how did she get to the alley. maybe she chased the perp.

the fact of the matter is, he was found not guilty by jury of his peers. don't get mad because he had good attorneys. the evidence just did not add up. if the police was more thorough and did not just focus on him, perhaps the truth would have come out. maybe he did do it, but you can't prove it.

Answer 3

Anyone who followed this case at all knows he's guilty. The only reason he was found not guilty was because of a hand-picked jury that ignored all the evidence against him. He was abusive towards Nicole and stalked her. For those who continue to believe he's innocent, let me ask these questions. Why was his blood at the crime scene? Why were there shoeprints of a particularly expensive brand of shoes there? Why was there a single glove from a pair of $55 gloves also there? Why didn't the dog attack him? It was a guard dog that would have gone after him if he had been a stranger. Why did he go on that low-speed chase with about $8000 in cash, a disguise, a plastic bag, and a shovel inside that Bronco? Why has he never shown any remorse or concern over his ex-wife and even puts her down in his book "If I Did It"? Yes, I know they were divorced but he sure doesn't act like the relative of a murder victim. He's not looking for her killers because he knows who did it.