how does anyone trust bush?

Question

his own departments report states iran ceased nuclear weapons pursuit 4 years ago.....and bushs defense is "they still want nucular weapons, so our position has not changed"

then he takes credit for this by claiming US pressure resulted in iran stopping their pursuit of nucular weapons.....when in fact it was the US who refused to negotiate/speak to iran, it was pressure from european nations who engaged iran and ended their nuclear program.

call me all the names you like------those are the facts.

Answer 1

Well you would, if you're blind, brainwashed and ignorant like the one who trust him!! Right?!!

This worthless is an example!

Answer 2

Here is the reality. Iran has an economy the size of Finland's and an annual defense budget of around $4.8 billion. It has not invaded a country since the late 18th century. The United States has a GDP that is 68 times larger and defense expenditures that are 110 times greater. Israel and every Arab country (except syria & Iraq) are quietly or actively allied against Iran. And yet we are to believe that Tehran is about to overturn the international system and replace it with an Islamo-fascist order? What planet are we on?
When the relatively moderate Mohammed Khatami was elected president in Iran, American conservatives pointed out that he was just a figurehead. Real power, they said (correctly), especially control of the military and police, was wielded by the unelected "Supreme Leader," Ayatolla Ali Khamenei. Now that Ahmadinejad is president, they claim his finger is on the button. (Oh wait Iran doesn't have a nuclear button yet and won't for at least three to eight years, according to the CIA, by which point Ahmadinejad may not be president anymore. But these are just facts.)
In a speech, Rudy Giuliani said that while the Soviet Union and China could be deterred during the cold war, Iran can't be. the Soviet and Chinese regimes had a "residual rationality," he explained. Hmm. Stalin and Mao--who casually ordered the deaths of millions of their own people, formented insurgencies and revolutions, and starved whole regions that opposed them--were rational folk. But no Ahmadinejad, who has done what that compares? One of the bizarre twists of the current Iran hysteria is that conservatives have become surprisingly charitable about two of history's greatest mass murderers.
Last year, the Princeton scholar, Bernard Lewis, a close adviser to Bush and VPresident Cheny, wrote an op-ed in The Wall Street Journal predicting that on Aug. 22, 2006, President Ahmadinejad was going to end the world. The date, he explained, "is the night when many Muslims commemorate the night flight of the Prophet Muhammad on the winged horse Buraq, first to "the farthest mosque", usually identified with Jerusalem, and then to heaven and back. This might well be deemed an appropriate date for the apocalytic ending of Israel and if necessary of the world" (my emphasis). This would all be funny if it weren't so dangerous.

Answer 3

Its a difficult situation that only poses more questions. Like why isn't something true unless it's on the news? On the flip-side nothing is true or believed until it's on CNN? They have control over what we see and hear in this country and in Europe. Bush's undying alliances (England, France, Germany) are with the ones who seek to change this world for the worse. Everyone else is trying to make us see the wickedness of this government. They've taken on an entire religion. They show video of Arabs fighting US soldiers. What would Americans do if you shot at them and they had guns? They would shoot back! There isn't an Al Queda; no Bin Laden, they created a shadow to blame for their agenda. Six years we've been at war and no WMD's, no Bin Laden. We were told about how dangerous Saddam was, but we took his country from him in two weeks. The only reality in this war are the ones who are dying. These people have the problems and solutions in the same hand. America has been force-feeding an idea of democracy to everyone. When they chose otherwise they are destroyed, and you won't see that on CNN. This government is wicked in ways you wouldn't imagine. Bush isn't half the demon his father is. He's up front for our amusment.

Answer 4

Kerry never called the troops idiots, that is an outright lie. He has been misquoted multiple times by those incapable of understanding what he actually said.

Clinton should never have been in a position to lie to the nation and were it not for a Republican controlled Congress hell bent on destroying Clinton it would never have happened.

Gullible, weak people trust Bush. People incapable of using fact or logic trust Bush.People who think the US can do no wrong trust Bush. People incapable of understanding more than a 30 second sound bite off the news trust Bush.

Answer 5

The announcement took the wind out of Bush's sails momentarily, then he resumed beating his chest about how you can't trust Iran in the future. George is going to have his Iran War one way or another, he is just that obsessed with it.

Answer 6

Thats how Republican works,

if the problem is going to down the toilet, blame the democrats
if the problem was fixed by the democrats or others, I(republicans) must take credits for the job well done even though I started the problem in the first place and didnt do jack about it.

Answer 7

The sad news is no one but the Republican party doesnt care about America they only care about winning elections and having the control to keep the rich richer and the poorer poorer so they will put anyone in office despite the hardships of Americans smoke and mirrors and mudslinging is there mode of operation.

Answer 8

Well, actually more than 70% of Americans don't trust Bush.
So do I... Bush is ready to destroy any nation because he is just oil hungry. And he doesn't plan to quit in 2008. You must understand that there's just too much money. And he CAN and he WILL cancel the 2008 election to continue this god damn "Course"...

Answer 9

Bush might have presenile dementia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pw4Bhmm22xo

Answer 10

the first guy chooses to refer to himself as "worthless"

i am inclined to agree with him on only that point