a s l u t is a woman with a man's morals, what do you think about this statement?

Question

don't be hating me. It's not my statement.

Answer 1

i think it is wrong simply because it assumes than all men have the same morals or morality . bad morals are not part of any gender just as good morals aren't either . being a slut is not equal to be man like but is a name which may be unfair but was created by people who did not agree with or like the way some women live .

Answer 2

i imagine what you're overlooking is that everybody is attempting to trudge alongside the course of "God's will" to boot as they could. human beings are continuously going to be human...finished of mistakes and imperfections. i imagine everybody is basically attempting to determine all of it out and infrequently being in a huge team can help human beings experience a touch better look after and a lot less on my own. look, i'm no longer Catholic, yet even as i change into in extreme college, I attended a Catholic college. I requested the priest quicker or later about the completed problem of who's ideal and who's inaccurate thinking the diverse faiths, tribes, cultures, etc. He instructed me that really everybody is ideal in only doing the finished they could and God is conscious that so there is not any want to fret for anybody. i imagine it really is a especially sturdy translation of all of it.

Answer 3

Your description of a sl*t would be a generalization that insults all men while trying to insult one woman. Totally unfair because there are a lot of great guys out there who do have high moral standards.

By the way, my 'Dictionary of Slang and Euphemisms' says a sl*t is: a nasty slattern; a sexually loose woman [a term used in the U.S. from the mid 1900s]. A 'slattern'----I looked that up too---is a: carelessly dressed and sloppy woman, a dirty and sloppy housekeeper [a termed used since the early 1600s]. I just threw these definitions in because I love that book.

Answer 4

That may be the way it seems because of the sexual double standard, but that's been proven to be false. Besides, most men have better morals than that.

Answer 5

Anyone who really believes that is a moron. However, this statement does illustrate our society's outlook on sex and sexual freedom.

Basically, men are allowed to do with their bodies as they please, but women are called s!uts and wh*res for the same, sometimes less.

Personally, any person, man or woman, who would call someone a s!ut is an arrogant jerk. Calling someone a s!ut is essentially claiming the moral high ground and authority to tell that person what s/he can and cannot do with his/her own body. It's awful.

Answer 6

Therefore by definition a gigolo is either a whore with a penis, or a man using female morality (as attributed to his female side).
Personally I am more your average tramp than a mere slattern. Come to think of it I'm just a cheap tart. Hell not only am I cheap, I am even prepared to give in away for free!
Cheers!

Answer 7

it can be taken as a comment on sexual double standards ie: men are "supposed" to sleep around, and women arent.

I didnt see it as an assertion that either is immoral, only a comment on how we view sexuality in a gendered context.

Answer 8

That's interesting you should "quote" that because "some" of feminism "today" is women proving how much like men they can be. And if imitation is the best form of flattery? -makes you wonder how that jives with true femininity in the feminist movement.

Answer 9

I don't care about the statement.

Do you have a man's moral? If yes, please add me as your contact.

Answer 10

That's pretty offensive to men, women...and slutts.