After finding out that Iran ceased its nuclear weapons program 4 years ago, President Bush said the following:
"Look, Iran was dangerous, Iran is dangerous and Iran will be dangerous if they have the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon," and he stated that he will not take the possibility of pre-emptive military action against Iran off the table (AP).
This sounds petty, childish, illogical, and unsound to me. What do you think?
2007-12-04 13:30:54 · 23 answers · asked by Cinnibuns 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
He's worse than unsound, he's criminal and showing a pattern of premeditated manipulation of public opinion to under gird his policy of invasion. This is exactly the demagoguery Hitler used.
2007-12-04 17:22:13 · answer #1 · answered by Fr. Al 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Petty, childish, illogical and unsound? G. W. Bush? How you talk! A little off? Naw. More like a LOT off. :-(
He also said that since Iran never acknowledged that they had such a program, it "gets to the question of TRUST." Junior doesn't have a whole lot of room to be talking about trust. Next he'll be questioning someone's credibility.
-Z
edit: Shouldn't it be an impeachable offense to pronounce nuc-le-ar NUC-YUH-LER?
2007-12-04 22:03:54 · answer #2 · answered by Zee 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's George Bush! Your last sentence says all i have to say about him.
Iran and Iraq were never really a problem, it's all about the oil, it was only when America went in there and dragged us British with them that they actually discovered how much more was going on behind the scenes and i still believe that they don't know the half.
The Weapons of Mass Destruction thing was a total cover up and now he's running out of excuses so this is all he can come up with!
2007-12-05 08:18:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
You pretty much know the answer to President Bush. When voters become more informed about whom they want to "sit" in the White House, our situation on the world stage will change. I wish that God will give us a President who is intelligent and has a "sincere" love for this country. Only then we will be progressive.
2007-12-05 01:50:53 · answer #4 · answered by In God We Trust 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
http://www.canadaka.net/video/293-jean-chretien-a-proof-is-a-proof.html
Jean Chretien to the press during the WMD fiasco starring Colin Powell. Tony Blair was jumping into Dubya's lap the little guy from Shawinigan was carving an different path.
I want proof too!
2007-12-05 22:04:38 · answer #5 · answered by Duncan w ™ ® 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Makes sense to me. Iran is dangerous and probably has nuclear capabilities. George just needs an interpreter.
2007-12-04 21:41:08 · answer #6 · answered by Max 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I'd say leave Iran alone and actually help them to develop nuclear arms......see how you're gonna sleep at night.
2007-12-05 05:44:39 · answer #7 · answered by tyler durden Oƒƒicial 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
When you catch somebody in a lie, they'll start snortin' and snuffin' and dubble-clutchin' like that. GW is a war criminal..we
are nearing Fascism and a police state, and we should storm the castle, Ceausescu style..
2007-12-05 06:46:07 · answer #8 · answered by Farmer & Granny Crabtree 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I think dubya should forget about Iran and be more concerned about YOU. Look what you did to that poor little kitty!!!!!
2007-12-04 21:35:22 · answer #9 · answered by fishbulb 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. But then, how does this sound any different from anything the man has ever said? The best part of him ran down his mother's leg.
2007-12-04 21:36:02 · answer #10 · answered by Маsha_Resurrected 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋