why? (finacial transactions, id, etc.)
and if you develop a disease from it and they go out business,
or is it the "mark of the beast"?
2007-12-04 12:47:40 · 5 answers · asked by omnimog 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I will not accept an RFID chip, even if it means that I have to give up my life! *sm*
2007-12-04 13:25:22 · answer #1 · answered by LadyZania 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think a chip, in and of itself is the Mark of the Beast. I do not believe it will be possible to accept the Mark of the Beast without KNOWING you are accepting the Mark. However, I don't trust a corporation to implant a GPS chip in my CELL PHONE, let alone in ME.
2007-12-04 13:33:26 · answer #2 · answered by STEVEN F 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. We have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the US. The government already knows enough personal information about private citizens, I do not want them having the ability to track my movements. I do not care how many murders it would stop, children it would keep safe or any other thing they could use to sell it, I would never trust a corporation to implant a microchip in me.
2007-12-04 12:51:41 · answer #3 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
At the current state of the nation and technology no. But if technology got so much better that I could enhance my senses greatly, my calculating capacity, or something that would detect irregular functions in my body then I wouldn't mind it. If its like prosthetics and such to enhance your physical abilities then yes to that 2. But not right now the technology needs much much more development but I think its something thats inevitable not right now but maybe in the next couple of centuries.
2007-12-04 17:58:43 · answer #4 · answered by archy 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope.........wasn't born with one - ain't gonna die with one
2007-12-04 12:51:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋