after all, their very existence is at stake.
2007-12-04 12:46:32 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20071204/wl_mcclatchy/2773393
2007-12-04 12:48:04 · update #1
If you believe Iran leadership I have a bridge to sell you. A country like a person has to show some forthrightness and honesty before I can start to judge whether they are honest. My feeling right now is they are striving very hard to obtain a nuclear bomb to eliminate Israel and then they will come for the west. Without any doubt they are the new fascists in the world and seek world domination even if there isn't much left of the world. They are fanatical and you can only deal with them with power and no appeasement. We should not forget the lesson of Hitler. They are really no different except their Arab. Unfortunately we need more countries on our side and it seems Europe in particular has not learned its lesson when it come to appeasement and shame on them.
2007-12-04 13:42:50 · answer #1 · answered by Robert S 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
IRONIC the same National interlligence estimate said that Iraq had WMDs in 2003. BUT it was a lie. the Democrats rallied behind that also for politics. Yet again, the NIE has come out with this report, saying the Iranians have halted their Nuke ambitions, the democrats are also rallting behind this report. However, the same NIE was dead wrong about Iraq.
the same National interlligence estimate also says that Iran continues to enrich uranium could FINISH building a Nuke by 2010. Geee.. that sounds like only 2 years from now.
2007-12-04 13:26:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
you may attempt gazing this internet site. despite if the honestly expression, "we will use nuclear weapons on Israel," does no longer seem, the reason being there. Why else could they be making an investment lots into paying for a nuclear potential? non secular extremists act much less responsibly than moderates, and the extremists have referred to as for the destruction of Israel. So what, are you asserting that we could desire to continually forget approximately non-proliferation of nuclear weapons only by means of fact they have not publicly declared their objective to apply nuclear weapons on Israel? will we anticipate them to benefit a nuclear potential in the previous we take action? Does this no longer play precisely into the grand scheme of issues that Iran's extremists recommend? It could desire to be superb residing a existence with eyes closed close and ears that may no longer hear. yet whilst the bombs start up falling, you will possibly no longer see them, nor hear them, yet you will honestly experience them. OOPS, by using then that's going to be too previous due. J, that's a stable source additionally.
2016-10-10 06:43:13 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here are some articles on the subject you might find a bit interesting. It appears America and Israel are having a disagreement... I wonder what this could lead to!
It also appears that different news sources have different spins on the thing!
Dispute Over Iran's Nuclear Program Throws Israel-US Relations Into Grave Crisis
http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/news.php?id=5418
Israel Publicly Challenges US Intelligence Report
http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/news.php?id=5419
Bush Drops Military Option, Tehran Slams Door on Diplomacy
http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/news.php?id=5410
Bush: Iran, was, Iran is and Iran Will be a Danger to the World
http://www.virtualjerusalem.com/news.php?id=5411
2007-12-05 08:15:13 · answer #4 · answered by S K 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Israeli Intelligence is the best in the world. I believe Iran stopped in in 2003 then shortly after restarted just as they say. If i hadn't heard it from Israeli Intel i would not have believed they stopped.
Why did they stop? Did they switch opperations to Syria(just destroyed) out of fear that Israel would rightly stop it, just as they did with Sadaam?
2007-12-05 06:48:11 · answer #5 · answered by wayne 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
People are unbelievable. This report changes nothing. Right now Iran is trying to enrich uranium. What good is a nuke program if you can't enrich uranium? So they put the program on the back burner. If they gain the ability to enrich uranium, they can restart their nuke program again. The report goes on to say that Iran could get nuke capabilities in the next 3-7 years. Hello!! That is not that far away. That will be during the next president's tenure, especially if they are a 2 term president.
2007-12-04 13:01:04 · answer #6 · answered by Dude 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I would believe Israel over the lib spin doctors any day of the week>
Saying that...It amazes me that the same democrats that have taken Bush to task time and time again to this day because he, and Hillery, and Bubba, and EVERYONE believed the Intelligence community about WMD and Nukes in Iraq...
Now these same libs, Dems, and America Bashers are just ecstatic and joyfully singing the praises of new reports on Iranian WMD and Nukes FROM THE SAME INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES!!!
Doesn't anyone see the huge hypocrisy! Either believe them or don't....and please make up your mind and be consistent! Peace on Earth may well depend on it.
2007-12-04 12:59:00 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 6⤋
Israel has shown us time and time again that they engage in terrorist activities. The NIE is right. And besides, Israel has nukes themselves, maybe we should invade them?
2007-12-04 12:59:24 · answer #8 · answered by Dangerous Dad 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Y E S!! Remember the US Embassy Takeover
in Tehran, Iran on November, 1979!!!!!!
2007-12-04 13:01:00 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 3⤊ 5⤋
Israel has a LOT more riding on this issue than we do at this point in history.
2007-12-04 12:51:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋