Isn't it true that the Environmentalists are part of the problem?

Question

In my opinion they are contributing to the very problem they aim to solve.

Two big climate conferences have been held in less than a month, both in idyllic, far-flung, holiday destinations — first Valencia, Spain, and now Bali. They were preceded by dozens of smaller gatherings. In Bangkok, Paris, Vienna, Washington, New York and Sydney, in Rio de Janeiro, Anchorage, Helsinki and the Indian Ocean island of Kurumba.

The U.N. estimates 47,000 tons of carbon dioxide and other pollutants will be pumped into the atmosphere during the 12-day conference in Bali, mostly from plane flights but also from waste and electricity used by air conditioners at five-star hotels lining palm-fringed beaches.

If correct, that is equivalent to what a Western city of 1.5 million people, like Marseilles, France, would emit in a day.

But real figure will be twice that, more like 100,000 tons, close to what the African country of Chad churns out in a year.

What say you?

Answer 1

Instead of flying around the globe to "discuss" things. Why don't they get down to resolving some of these issues. If people would "do" more than "talk" we all could accomplish more.
If they have a question or need to discuss something, why don't they just call on the phone?

Answer 2

genuine,fantastically much! I labored interior the Nuclear means marketplace from the early Sixties to the late Nineteen Eighties. I observed the marketplace exchange from forty 4 month engineering/shape schedules to construct a plant to as much as fifteen years with initiatives that have been cancelled earlier of completion. I sat in a single thousand's of hours of public hearings with environmentalist/intervienors and AEC/NRC regulators and observed the AEC/NRC exchange from being advocates of Nuclear means to being the watchdog for the environmentalist and rigidity from congress. The time cycle to license a plant greater beneficial 10 fold. The proponents actually misplaced the PR conflict via no longer instructing the universal public. yet that became earlier we observed "carbon footprint" and "means independence." regardless of is going around? Coal plant produce infinitely greater beneficial than 50X CO2 then a Nuclear. Nuclear flowers launch 0 carbon emissions, and the nuclear waste from a Nuclear plant is approximately .001% of the quantity of the waste ash from a coal fired plant. a tremendous number of ash ought to be hauled faraway from a coal plant, collectively as the Nuclear spent gasoline has been stored on web site in spent gasoline pits for some years. Hydo is what that's. not greater rivers to block. Wind has promise yet what environmental result? photograph voltaic is supplemental at applicable. electric transportation desires to interchange fossil powered interior the long-term. Battery technologies is the foremost for that to take place. McCain is powerful to signify subsidies for brand spanking new battery technologies. Hydrogen demands electricity to produce. persons are no longer prepared to evaluate Nuclear means as "renewable" yet do no longer neglect the "breader reactor " that produces greater gasoline then it consumes. One be conscious defines why we dropped that technologies------------- "plutonium."

Answer 3

Everyone living in most countries today is "part of the problem" unless of course, one is completely off the grid and removed from society and working under autarky.

However environmentalists:
a) are aware of their, and others' effects
b) try to show others about the effects on the environment
c) try to change things so that being industrialized and enjoying the fruits of society doesn't mean environmental destruction.

I think that going to a meeting where things get accomplished and change happens is a simple case where the benefits outweigh the costs.

Answer 4

So....if you believe we should try to protect the environment, you should travel by horse and buggy????? If they used the telephone to have a conference call you guys would come up with statistics that 50 tons of coal were burned to produce the current to make those calls. Pathetic!

Answer 5

EnviroMENTALcases are a big part of all the problems. Energy dependence, wildfires (which created more CO2 than a years worth of driving, and destroyed the very thing that recycles the co2). I can take up the cause of keeping the Environment clean, but you have to allow some give and take somewhere.

Answer 6

I've heard that a vegan diet can make a person emit more CO. gas than a typical 4 cylinder economy car.

Answer 7

Pollution and greed are the problem

Answer 8

The planes would still run if barely anyone bought tickets.

Answer 9

I say that all people contribute, on both sides. People often don't practice what they preach either. I don't know why you expect more.

Answer 10

"Part" of the problem ??? They are doing their best to BE the problem !

I hope all those envirowhackos freeze to death in the dark. In the meantime , I'll be warmed by starting a fire, and to hell with the "carbon footprint" it leaves ...I'll be warm, and they will be freezing.