am I the only here who see the hilarity of this deal?
2007-12-04 12:31:07 · 7 answers · asked by jasonpickles 3 in Sports ➔ Baseball
dude they only got one good lefty and you know who. kenny rogers is washed up, nate robertson can pitch innings but he serves up meatballs.
if they knew they getting willis they shouldnt have resigned that over-aged fat toad kenny rogers
2007-12-04 14:34:37 · update #1
Yea... kinda odd... most teams that they are competing with are better vs. lefties than righties: Take the Indians for example:
R- .266
L- .274
Big difference...
Although, also, they aren't changing anything... They had Andrew Miller, a lefty, now they have the D-Train... another lefty... no real change in left/right pitching quantities.
2007-12-04 12:51:17 · answer #1 · answered by Reduviidae 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, if you look at the Yankees line up they are stacked with lefties. Just an example of a contender Detroit might have to face.
Damon, Abreu, Giambi, Cano, Matsui all are lefties.
2007-12-04 20:56:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Dodgers for YEARS had NONE. If it could at all be managed, over staffed with lefties would be better. Especially some of THEIR lefties.
2007-12-04 21:14:19 · answer #3 · answered by Sarrafzedehkhoee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cause its Dontrelle Willis. Your saying that if we had a chance to nab Santana you wouldnt take him because that would make 4 lefty starters? A good pitcher is a good pitcher, from either side of the mound.
2007-12-04 20:40:34 · answer #4 · answered by Bonds 2 · 6⤊ 0⤋
Why not? Can never have to many leftys on a team. You never complained about 3 rightys, why are you complaining about 3 leftys?
2007-12-04 21:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by McMoose--RIPYAHS 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
The deal isn't going to be funny to the teams that have to figure out a way to beat them.
2007-12-04 20:56:38 · answer #6 · answered by Frizzer 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
why not need 3 lefts why need 3 rightys
2007-12-04 20:33:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋