has no nuclear weapons. Are you going to buy his arguments that they are still an "imminent" threat to the US and are part of the War on Terror. Are you part of his delusions too?
2007-12-04 12:19:25 · 27 answers · asked by Jackie Oh! 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Lamplight-Your answer made me laugh, of course you noticed the drones. LOL
2007-12-04 12:34:58 · update #1
Only an absolute and complete drone would respond in the affirmative to this question. Anyone capable of independent, creative thought would be highly suspicious of anything Bushco had to say on this matter in the future.
Edit:
Naturally. :)
2007-12-04 12:30:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10⤊ 4⤋
No. I have not supported him in the years he has been in office. I knew he was going to be a bad president and he has not disappointed. He follows in the footsteps of Reagan who was very bad, George Bush Sr who was bad, and this Bush tops all of them.
The biggest threat to this country has been this administration since 9/11. He has been a threat to civil liberties, alienating us from our friends in the world, going to war against a nation that had no nuclear weapons instead of chasing Bin Laden in Afghanistan, forgetting about the poor and middle class, and rushing to sign a bill to keep a brain dead woman alive. This man has never had any class or decency to do the right thing and he never will.
2007-12-04 12:31:01 · answer #2 · answered by centrixbear 2 · 8⤊ 2⤋
No patriotic American supports GW Bush, the biggest liar ever to hold any office anywhere in the world and the human who has done more damage to the United States than anyone else in history. Silly question!
2007-12-04 14:02:37 · answer #3 · answered by worldinspector 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
People are unbelievable. This report changes nothing. Right now Iran is trying to enrich uranium. What good is a nuke program if you can't enrich uranium? So they put the program on the back burner. If they gain the ability to enrich uranium, they can restart their nuke program again. The report goes on to say that Iran could get nuke capabilities in the next 3-7 years. Hello!! That is not that far away. That will be during the next president's tenure, especially if they are a 2 term president.
2007-12-04 13:05:13 · answer #4 · answered by Dude 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
God, of course not. Bush is an evil lying liar who is being led by large and major oil companies so that they can put their dirty hands on other country's natural resources. They do not care of loss of any life, all see is a $$ signs in their eyes.
2007-12-04 12:40:36 · answer #5 · answered by RLP 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
The more we threaten Iran, surround them with our military, and support their greatest enemy, the greater the chance they will try to attack us. By the way, Bush won't go to war because he can't. Who would he send? Who would actually fight with us? How would we pay for it? That is why they are all talk right now. The only way he goes after Iran is if he ends the occupation of Iraq, which doesn't seem likely.
2007-12-04 12:31:33 · answer #6 · answered by Hennessy 4 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Let me start by saying that Amadinejad is no prize either...
But I think if Bush's own crew is saying that there is no nuclear weapons, then Bush should probably take the hint this time...
Of course, intelligence and the Bush Co. are hardly synonymous anyway....
2007-12-04 12:26:16 · answer #7 · answered by rabble rouser 6 · 12⤊ 2⤋
well if mr bush decides to diarm nuclear war weapons i say well done has i hate viloence and war
2007-12-04 13:19:14 · answer #8 · answered by Michael Schumacher fan 1956 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I didn't support him when he invaded and occupied Iraq. And I have no intention of supporting that chimpanzee and his gang of AIPAC owned thugs in any invasion of Iran.
We've had enough of his lies. Time to ship him back to the zoo.
2007-12-04 12:56:33 · answer #9 · answered by tamarindwalk 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
National Intelligence Estimate from various intelligence agencies vs. Pres. Cheney and the little trained monkey who's lies got us into the Iraqi Civil War quagmire.
You decide.
2007-12-04 12:27:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 3⤋