Diamond and gold miners aren't any better off. The wealth is concentrated either to a government for use as national income, or in cases of gold and diamond mining the corporate heads get the biggest portion of the pie.
2007-12-04 11:40:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by TJTB 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lots of oil, but controlled by only a few.
There is plenty of sand in most Middle Eastern countries, but not worth too much.
2007-12-04 11:45:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bubba 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
in part (as indicated by using different solutions) by means of those that positioned resourses into processing the "organic" components / mining / refining, etc. get to make the money from the sale of those subtle / mined components. additionally in part by means of character of oil - as a product ... it turns right into a keystone export. If a 0.33-worldwide u . s . is fortunate sufficient to be a producer of a worldwide-huge-needed-commodity, little else (as an export) can upward push to that time. additionally, the production of oil does no longer inevitably recommend that every person in the rustic can "participate" in the earnings from that production ... no u . s ., even a Communist u . s ., could have the skill to hire every person in the rustic in the procurement and refinement of a single export-product. It sounds such as you truly do no longer understand the essense of a corporation, nor a corporation' real accountability. To make a income and grant dividends to its traders. that's it. A corporation has NO requirement to divide or distribute its earnings to the well-known public. despite if the employer is OWNED and OPERATED by using a central authority, earnings from that employer won't clear out all the way down to "the undesirable". Communism continues to be a failed test. a 0.33 worldwide u . s . needs to develop and inspire a large form of firms so as that people who're "undesirable" can raise their very own status even with the indisputable fact that gainfull employment in those firms. government "giving" help / money to "the undesirable" does no longer honestly help every person who's "undesirable". government getting out of ways of starting to be a useful corporation which grants a job to "the undesirable" helps the undesirable. (by using how that's no longer "... lots undesirable human beings ...", that's ".. lots of undesirable human beings ...", or "... lots poverty in oil-wealthy ...".)
2016-10-10 06:35:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wealthy are the ruling class, no middle class, theocracy. See a trend anywhere else?
2007-12-04 11:36:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bob O 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
not a real big market for sand.
2007-12-04 11:32:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by avail_skillz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
because they're all have dictators
2007-12-04 11:37:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by captain_koyk 5
·
0⤊
0⤋