English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The UN has frustrated his attempts

Russia and China have warned against it

Israel's former PM is saying it is 1938 and Iran is Germany

The newest report say 2010-15 but that Iran stopped it's weapon program in 2003 and was guided by a cost effective means to energy not to get a bomb

But Bush is saying it is a danger and might have the bomb in less that 3 yrs maybe sooner

Iran's revolutionary guards have been branded terrorists by Bush The US Marines have been branded terrorists by the Iranians and Bush says Iran is killing US soldiers in Iraq and Afganistan with road side bombs among other things Iran deniies this as propaganda

At the EU meeting Iran didn't give an inch insisting that it is their right to have nuclear power for energy

2007-12-04 11:01:45 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

22 answers

Its fifty - fifty. We are at a crossroads. I know Bush and the Neocon crazies who are using him for a figurehead are beating the war drums all the more loudly now...but
This NIE has to have taken some of the wind out of their sails.

What's at sake is more than just another illegal war aimed of getting an advantage in the global economy.

There may be enough power to stop Bush from doing this.
We'll have to wait and see.

2007-12-04 11:20:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

he shouldn't do it and everyone knows it. he will not get away easy if he does. it is just a plain bad idea, i think the only reason he could possibly have for going in now is to not lose face, but i don't even think he has enough time now... (i might be a little biased because im half iranian) and i would probably say that is IS propaganda and even though the current president of Iran is crazy, Iran totally showed bush by making the US Marines terrorists. I'm not a huge bush hater, but if he goes through with this i will be. that will be simply screwing over the next president, he is already leaving enough of a mess...

2007-12-04 11:06:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

About zero.

With the comments from Israel it looks like they are telling America what to do. In a sense, top officials have been comprimised. Whats going to happen is that Israel will attack Iran, which the U.S. will come to Israel's aid.

This means Israel would have to attack Iran before Bush leaves office, or it won't happen. It is a now or never situation for Israel, which its trying to speed up the prophecy for the End of Days or the Apocalypse.

Supposedly Israel is Zion, which Zion means the chosen or gods chosen people. Others believe that the North and South Americas is Zion. What isn't looked at by people is that the meaning of Zion could be the complete opposite especially when the Babylonians version is used. If one thinks about it, "gods chosen people" shows favoritism, which a God would not emit favoritism since we could all be considered his/her children/people. In this aspect, chosen could be considered chosen, as in chosen to be made as an example of due to corruption and greed.

If Israel wants to be Zion bad enough, they can. It just looks to me like being Zion is something extremely bad such as being branded cursed or forsakened.

These wars are not just for wealth, because wealth can't buy absolute power. What is trying to be accomplished through these religious delusions is for absolute power.

Point blank, both Israel and the U.S. look like they are the exact opposite of candyland. Corruption, decay, etc..

2007-12-04 11:26:37 · answer #3 · answered by Arcanum Noctis 5 · 1 1

Oh, I see the fee YOU pay for gas is extra important than the lives of each and every of the persons who could be killed by using Iran's atomic bomb. What do you think of is going to ensue to the economic device whilst Iran pops one in Israel and then Israel makes Tehran glow? Or what approximately whilst some terrorist a lot a bomb interior a shipment field and contraptions it off on the port of Baltimore, massive apple, or Miami? except you have some terminal ailment, you will see conflict in Iran quickly despite if that's the u . s . or Israel.

2016-10-10 06:28:18 · answer #4 · answered by buswell 4 · 0 0

Rumsfeld said that the war would last at least six years, when asked, at the start of this.
I think we should have used the massive air power Force that we have, to pound the state of Iraq immediately, using our manpower to catch terrorists at the borders when the country was given an ultimatum to expel them and/or leave or else. To end it quickly, as in World War II with Atomic bomb.
We will never be rid of evil attitudes in people. They that have them just join up with a new group, started in each generation.
Iran wants' Iraq, to absorb it's resources.
In the Bible, Persia- or the Arabian peninsula will be involved in the last war,
going in with Russia to attack Israel for oil, as they will find a large amount under their coastline, and China will then attack them, as it consumes' a very large amount of oil as it is now.
It is inevitable that the conflicts will happen.
What we need to do is to try and be prepared for a few years' survival until we are beamed up by the Lord and learn to help people and then aide others during these End times.
Jeremiah 48 spells' out in the Bible that Babylon, Magog- Iraq- same thing: will be destroyed utterly. In the last verse of this chapter, in the King James only; later versions dropped' it , but crucial information- it says that this happens' a second time that Babylon is destroyed in the End times.
Inevitable.

2007-12-04 11:15:33 · answer #5 · answered by Charles E 3 · 0 4

Bush won't be around long enough to even try. Notice he said "less than THREE years." He's covering his butt. He's got just over a year, and it simply is not happening, even if he wants to. With all the hooplah over Iraq, I don't see it happening next President, either, unless they want to be a single-termer. It's funny. Had Bush kept his sorry nose out of Iraq, he'd probably have everyone's support on this. Shot his own foot on this one.

2007-12-04 11:10:59 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 1 1

No he won't, and you are quoting pretty dated information. If Iran has halted its Bomb development the only person that deserves the credit is president Bush. If true that means hes 3 for 3, Libya, North Korea and now Iran. looks like hes doing a far better job than any liberal could have done.

2007-12-04 13:44:23 · answer #7 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 0 3

For the Maya calender the "End of the World" happens in 2012.

If something bigger than 11/9 happens against USA (real or fake it doesn't really matter), probably the Maya were too optimistic.

2007-12-04 11:15:23 · answer #8 · answered by Adynaton 3 · 1 1

He won't, of course. He does not take any military action beyond parading in a flight suit. He might send three hundred marines, though. That's about as many as he seems to have over after handling the conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq.

:-)

2007-12-04 11:11:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

We can only pray that he does not.. or that our ***** congress does not let him again. And somebody needs to check and double check and triple check anything Bush puts in his speeches. He lied to us once.. he will do it again!

Lets just hope this is not a case of "boy cried wolf".. we could all end up dead...but we were busy in Iraq......

2007-12-04 13:51:06 · answer #10 · answered by Debra H 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers