irans wmd program..
2007-12-04 10:54:20 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They will keep their heads buried in the sand. Neo-cons still refuse to say Bush was wrong about ANYTHING concerning the Middle East. This is a sign of immaturity when one cannot bring themselves to say "I or Bush was wrong".
Bush lied to invade Iraq. Now he has been caught lying to attack Iran.
Q: Will Hillary yet again say "If I knew then what I know now, I would not have voted to support Bush's calling the Iranian guard a terrorist organization"?
2007-12-04 11:00:37 · answer #1 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 4⤊ 5⤋
"...16 U.S. intelligence agencies, in a stunning reassessment, had concluded with "high confidence" that Iran had HALTED its nuclear program in 2003 and with "moderate confidence" that it hadn't restarted that program as of mid-2007..."
It says halted not abandoned. So-called experts do not know with 100% certainty that Iran is pursuing the nuclear weapons.
However, if Iran's nuclear program is strictly for peaceful purpose, why do they keep it secret from the international atomic agency. Why risk the economic sanctions?
When somebody threatens you, you would better take it seriously, otherwise the price to pay will be higher.
USA has done a huge favor to Iran by destroying Saddam's regime. Instead of pursuing nuclear weapons, Iran's government should spend money on programs that benefit their citizens.
Do you see anything wrong with my viewpoint?
2007-12-04 11:30:37 · answer #2 · answered by nosf37 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Tell you what if the Iranians did stop their atomic weapons program, only one man can take the credit. The same one liberals have been bashing for 7 years. President Bush's unceasing calls for sanctions plus diplomatic work and some tough talk has accomplished what no Liberal could have done.
2007-12-04 11:29:13 · answer #3 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well, libs claim that the "intelegence community mislead us on Iraqi WMD, so how about Iran?
Theyve been wrong before according to numerous lib coolaid sipers.
2007-12-04 11:06:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Israel says our info is faulty..they say Iran IS STILL enriching uranium....and they should know ..
2007-12-04 11:21:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
So . . . you guys are on the side of U.S. intelligence on this one?
It's always hard to tell.
2007-12-04 12:44:22 · answer #6 · answered by mark623112 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The only spin going on here is by you and Chi
2007-12-04 11:02:55 · answer #7 · answered by sammael_coh 4 · 5⤊ 5⤋
No problem
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/flashback-hillary-calls-for-iran-sanction
Tell me why no one is asking Hillary about this today?
2007-12-04 10:59:31 · answer #8 · answered by Michael 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Not. Only libtards spin.
Don't trust what we hear.
Obama got us this information by having sex with Ahmadinejad.
Now, do you still believe?
Do you really trust the Muslim Obama????
Hillary and I don't!!!
GO HILLARY!!!!!!
2007-12-04 11:11:50 · answer #9 · answered by dinamuk 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
"Clinton could have stopped it in the 1990s but didnt".
2007-12-04 11:08:01 · answer #10 · answered by Zinger! 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋