Let's not forget that Hillary and Obama would have attacked Iran too?

Question

Everyone's having a field day with this Bush Iran debacle, but don't forget that Hillary Clinton voted for the resolution to attack Iran too. I hope when election time rolls around that that there really is no difference between Bush and Hillary. They are all warmongers.

she voted to attack Iraq, but she said she didn't want to? What kind of partisan spin is that?

Answer 1

timely point - people are still heavily conditioned into being unable to see beyond the false neocon- lib paradigm
Even when pesky triviality as actual well founded FACTS are presented to them that may indicate it to be the case.
genuine independent thinkers seem to a rare bird these days - if not a endangered species.

Answer 2

Both of them have already stated that all options are on the table with Iran, but Senator Clinton would probably handle the situation more responsibly then Bush and Obama.

EDIT: Blake, do you even know what your own candidate stands for? Senator Obama didn't even bother to show up to make the vote and he actually co-sponsored a bill designating the IRG a terrorist organization back in April, he was even pushing for tougher sanctions against the country

Answer 3

Interesting where all the farcical "information" is coming from. Attacking Iraq was a decision made on lies; the whole country believed them. So, go ahead & believe the lies about Iran & while you guys are hiding your heads in the sand, you'll dig a lot deeper when the Anarchist starts WW III.
Sily, silly silly people...

Answer 4

Based on the bad information that the president received, the outcome would mostly likely have been the same regardless of who was in the office because of the 9/11.

Bash Bush, or bash anybody who would have been in his position at that time.

It was voted for so I guess they are ALL warmongers.

Answer 5

Baracka Hussein Obama,Jr., would not have a clue when and what to attack unless he could parrot some of the other candidates' opinions. Hussein is the ultimate inexperienced polly-parrot, with nothing original, and always copying the ideas, plans, and brainworks of others. Hussein is a fraud. Hussein confirmed this today on the NPR Democrat debate. Also, Hussein is a disgrace, and to confirm this, research the Web re American flag incident, also the Associated Press and Time attest to this naive and stupid act by the Muslim.

Answer 6

1st were holier than thou-- then when the hand gets caught in the cookie jar yet again you claim that everyone else is at fault too. It`s very simple, BUSH IS A LIAR A CHEATER AND A DI CKHEAD. Why do you people still defend him? Impeach him and find someone more worthy.

Answer 7

This is absolutely true. We have to understand that many of these candidates serve the same master regardless of their party affiliations. We MUST look at their record, not what they say they will do. They have both parties covered (with the exception of the candidates not in a lobby group pocket like Ron Paul).

It's like a horror movie:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ae5t_55OWbo

Answer 8

Just because she voted for it doesn't mean she wants to attack Iran.

She voted for attacking Iraq but said she didn't want to attack Iraq.

So the way she votes isn't what she means, so you can't use that against her.

Just because it isn't logical, doesn't meant it's not true. This IS Hillary we are talking about, reality is different with her.

Answer 9

Oh you mean that Hillary and Obama had the same intellegence that the administration fed our people, government and the world while the administration withheld vital information that would have not proved their case?

Now we're seeing the same with Iran. Seems our intelligence community knows that Iran hasn't been a nuke threat since 2003.

Peace

Jim

.

Answer 10

Based on the misinformation that Bush gave them. I thought Republicans were supposed to be all about Personal Responsibility?