Israel is barely the size of Connecticut and the USA took have its land from Mexico.
2007-12-04 10:22:39 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
the mexicans were somehow forced to sign a treaty where they gave up the land. and those territories are now internationally recognized as part of the united states.
the palestinians never gave up their land, thats why their territory is internationally considered as occupied and they still claim it back with the support of international law.
2007-12-06 19:42:32 · answer #1 · answered by maroc 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you have already got gained various stable solutions. i'm going to upload my 10 cents. Now if the U. S. has besieged Mexico for 3 years in a row, wherein the U. S. thoroughly controlled Mexico's air area and coasts and borders. the U. S. destroyed all Mexico's airports so as that Mexicans will have not got any get entry to to something of the international without US permission. With the U. S. in entire administration of something that is going in or out of Mexico, the U. S. now in basic terms facilitates specific varieties of meals and medicine to flow into Mexico, and that they permit one form of gas to flow into in small volume to run the potential stations, then the U. S. brags approximately how humanitarian this is for permitting the Mexicans to no longer die from starvation. With this crippling siege, many Mexicans die from malnutrition or loss of suitable scientific scientific care brought about by way of the U. S. blockade. additionally the U. S. keeps to objective Mexican leaders with their drones, killing many civilians interior the technique. Over the three-year siege, the U. S. kills thousands of Mexicans. The Mexicans attempt to stand up to and retaliate, yet they lack any weapons that come on the brink of US weaponry. The Mexicans in specific circumstances, launch hand-crafted rockets into the U. S. to verify the international knows the atrocities committed by way of the U. S. against the Mexicans. Now somebody with the slightest consumer-friendly experience could agree that, interior the above concern, the U. S. may be the undesirable guy, and the Mexicans are the stable men. nicely this is the region between Gaza and Israel, and Israel is definitely the undesirable guy there.
2016-09-30 21:12:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Palestine was part of the Ottoman Empire, then controlled by Britain from WWI to the creation of Jordan (1922) and Israel (1948).
Jews legally purchased the land for their country. Arabs were given the entirety of eastern Palestine for an Arab-Muslim country.
If anyone should be compensated its' 1 million Jews forced out of their homes in Arab countries:
http://www.jimena.org/
http://www.theforgottenrefugees.com/
The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct "Palestinian people" to oppose Zionism.
- Zahir Muhsein, 1977
2007-12-09 14:37:33 · answer #3 · answered by mo mosh 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, technically the Texas War of Independence had nothing to do with the United States. The US did not officially participate in the war, did not send soldiers, did not supply the Texans with arms or money. At the conclusion of the war, Texas was an independent nation for 9 years (1836 - 1845) before joining the United States (only to secede 15 years later).
A conspiracy theorist might say that the US sent all those white settlers into Mexico for the sole purpose of launching an armed revolution against the Mexican government, but this scenario is not really supported by the historical facts...
2007-12-04 10:29:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Everyone has a faction in Palestine, or Israil (nothing to do with the Jewish - are like these Daesh guys). Mexico & United States aren't different - with them, it's like money in this or the other pocket
2015-01-09 11:45:41 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel shouldn't give back land because it legitimately belongs to the Jews, having lived there from 6000 BC until a bunch of empires threw them out for being unruly.
And Mexico only ruled those parts of America because the Spanish conquered land from native americans. So it's okay for them but not for us
2007-12-04 10:38:24 · answer #6 · answered by Gonzo Rationalism 5 · 5⤊ 3⤋
What land was stolen from Mexico? The Gadsden purchase was legit and Texas won their FREEDOM through war. California they can have.
2007-12-05 08:05:14 · answer #7 · answered by wayne 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They shouldn't it's called war, and especially since Israel didn't start the war, but won it anyway they deserve to keep it. This is the way borders are changed, and no one ever gets a re-do!
2007-12-09 11:53:47 · answer #8 · answered by subxerorock 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The Southwest belonged to U.S. Native Americans. They are happy being Americans, not Mexicans.
Also, Spain owned the Southwest before Mexico did. Almost all of the large cities in California were named by Europeans.
2007-12-04 10:38:43 · answer #9 · answered by a bush family member 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Bottom line, maybe we all should give the land back to the Indians. We did not steal land from Mexico,we fought and won.
2007-12-04 10:34:46 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ Mel 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋