Okay, collective rights are the key words.
2007-12-04 09:51:44 · 7 answers · asked by Carly D 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Well, if they stick with that stance eventually they'll be in a bent-over position while the government sticks it to them.
2007-12-04 10:00:08 · answer #1 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Indivisable Republic! thats the united commitment of our people to allow the maintenance and ownership of firearms in the possesion of the Citizens under the precepts of our United States Constitution amendment number two! The right to have and bear arms, "collectively" as a people, as a militia and "army of citizens" if need be. We are in the position of might! Of insisiting on our Constitutional rights under the law of our Country!
2007-12-04 10:08:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Unlike the rest of the Constitution, which is written in plain English, the 2nd Amendment has tortured syntax that can be reasonably interpreted several ways, regardless of one's own position.
Sadly, grammar checking software was not perfected yet at that time, or else this would have been flagged and corrected in the draft stage :)
2007-12-04 10:00:08 · answer #3 · answered by Barry C 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably missionary and reverse cowgirl.
Seriously, I don't understand your question. The Second Am is an extremely important issue that is up for decision by the US Supreme Court. What do you mean by positions?
2007-12-04 09:56:16 · answer #4 · answered by eddygordo19 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Collectively", they can put a "collection" of bullets
"rights" between your cheeks if you try to take away the "collective rights"
In various "firing" positions !
2007-12-04 09:58:31 · answer #5 · answered by chuichupachichi 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are in the position of having a wrong opinion.
2007-12-04 09:57:57 · answer #6 · answered by Mister Cookie 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
what's the 2nd amendment?
2007-12-04 09:55:02 · answer #7 · answered by facetherevenge 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋