Oh my God, he's on to us! This will unfortunately set back our plans to take over the Department of Agriculture by several months.
2007-12-04 08:08:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by ck4829 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
The latest news from Iran about the supposed abandonment in 2003 of the effort to produce a Bomb — if even remotely accurate — presents somewhat of a dilemma for liberal Democrats.
Are they now to suggest that Republicans have been warmongering over a nonexistent threat for partisan purposes? But to advance that belief is also to concede that Iran, like Libya, likely came to a conjecture (around say early spring 2003?) that it was not wise for regimes to conceal WMD programs, given the unpredictable, but lethal American military reaction.
After all, what critic would wish now to grant that one result of the 2003 war — aside from the real chance that Iraq can stabilize and function under the only consensual government in the region — might have been the elimination, for some time, of two growing and potentially nuclear threats to American security, quite apart from Saddam Hussein?
War is unpredictable and instead of "no blood for oil" (oil went from $20 something to $90 something a barrel after the war, enriching Iraq and the Arab Gulf region at our expense), perhaps the cry, post facto, should have been "no blood for the elimination of nukes."
In the meantime, expect a variety of rebuttals to this assurance that for 4 years the Iranians haven't gotten much closer to producing weapons grade materials.
2007-12-04 08:10:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Incredible. Lets see now even our intelligence community is liberal? I guess I will keep it simple. If our teachers who probably are the most educated. Our media who is the most news informed. And now our intelligence agencey's who have the best access to information. All are liberal. Must be a clue.
2007-12-04 08:12:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steam 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
It appears the left is covertly trying to take over the US Government in a bloodless Coup, but the Blood will flow later when there is no one to defend them.
2007-12-04 08:24:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ok.... so now you want to blame "liberal conspiracy" for all the problems with the CIA too...
Nice kid!
2007-12-04 08:16:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by rabble rouser 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Right on...NO just kidding!
2007-12-04 08:09:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
What?
2007-12-04 08:08:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
clever girl !!!
2007-12-04 08:13:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋