Afganistan, Sudan, United Nations...et al...
2007-12-04 06:47:37 · 29 answers · asked by realitycheck 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
if by deal with you mean "suck up to, appease, kiss ***, throw money at, or look the other way" then any and all of them
2007-12-04 06:54:54 · answer #1 · answered by f0876and1_2 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
As you know, no president goes it alone. Bush has a cadre of advisors who mold his decisions and opinions about things. I say this to suggest one thing: Even the guy down at 7-11 could probably run the country with so much expert help behind him.
With that as a preface, I'll say that I will put my faith in any Democrat running because I believe they have better chops to handle domestic affairs that concern me -- the economy, immigration, Social Security, universal healthcare, etc -- than does any Republican running or likely to show up at the eleventh hour.
I am pro-The People, and anti-Big Business. It has to be a Democrat. Any Democrat will do.
2007-12-04 06:58:03 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Vincent Van Jessup 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
None of them because they will let these nations do whatever they want to their people. After all, Democrats have NO Compassion for helping people around the world.
2007-12-04 16:43:17 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Faith in a Democrat? Iran, N. Korea, China, Russia, Venezuela, Saudi Arabia would never take Hillary or Obama seriously.
2007-12-04 06:51:16 · answer #4 · answered by only p 6 · 6⤊ 7⤋
I put faith in no man or woman for that matter. and I don't think that any of the democrats are capable of handling any of this
2007-12-04 14:57:38 · answer #5 · answered by hmm 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would trust Biden much more than any other. He's got a pretty sharp tongue and I just bet there's an armory behind it.
2007-12-04 14:44:54 · answer #6 · answered by wider scope 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Senator Joseph Biden of the Foreign Affairs Committee!
2007-12-04 06:56:34 · answer #7 · answered by ArRo 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Al gore - he'd try to sue them incessantly into buying his green credits and would lobby the UN to help with this everyime. ok - that may only inflame them more!
2007-12-04 14:49:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sen Lieberman, otherwise none.
I Cr 13;8a
2007-12-04 14:51:38 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Senator Joe Lieberman
2007-12-04 06:53:02 · answer #10 · answered by Mother 6 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Congrats!
You win the Surrealist Award of the Day for posting this preposterous question.
As if.
As if you gave a CRAP how any of these nations have been "dealt" with for the past seven years.
bush's ENTIRE "foreign policy" has consisted of IGNORING Iran and North Korea nad BADMOUTHING Venezuala and FRENCH KISSING Saudi Arabia and "cutting and running" from Afghanistan and "where the hell is Sudan?" and insulting the United Nations.
Jeepers.
So....I think the ANSWER to your preposterous quasi-question is,
"ANY DEMOCRAT WOULD BE NINE TRILLION TIMES BETTER IN FOREIGN MATTERS than what we've had for eight years."
2007-12-04 06:52:35 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 5⤋