No, he needs to keep on acting. He seems to be able to memorize his lines for TV but can't remember what is going on in his own campaign. Of course most of his TV role on Law and Order are a few minuscule lines. His lackluster campaign is evidence of his commitment to leading the US. Also he would be devastating as President- lets not forget he was a contributor to Scooter Libby's defense fund.
2007-12-04 14:50:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by yourmtgbanker 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, I will be voting for myself since I am running for president as well. If I were not running then I would. He cracks me up and he is an old dude with a hot, young wife.
DRAGON 2008
"I BELIEVE IN U.S."
2007-12-04 13:35:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Fred's the man
He won't sacrifice his values to get in the White House unlike a certain lady from - ILLARKYORK who has been has been doing that her whole life.
2007-12-04 13:44:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Johnny 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I'd like to see a little more enthusiasm if I"m paying him four hundred thou a year plus vacation homes and lifetime health care and pension.
So no, I wouldn't vote for him.
2007-12-04 13:33:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by justa 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would vote for him, first he was great in Hunt for Red October, second he has no chance of winning.
2007-12-04 14:36:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I might kinda think about maybe voting for him, but I doubt it!!!!
2007-12-04 16:34:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Maybe...can you bring the voting booth to my couch?
2007-12-04 13:32:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No.
I don't vote for Republicans.
2007-12-04 13:56:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Sure.
FRED ON - APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE WHITE HOUSE - APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE WHITEHOUSE - APPLY DIRECTLY TO THE WHITE HOUSE...
Love Jack
2007-12-04 13:33:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jack 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Better than W...not as good as most.
2007-12-04 13:33:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋