2007-12-04 05:13:58 · 28 answers · asked by Stealth 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I cannot see how anyone could argue that he is not right. Its plainly obvious is it not?
2007-12-04 05:19:21 · answer #1 · answered by Calvin 7 · 4⤊ 7⤋
Yes. A vote for any politician is a vote for continued corruption. That's how it works.
You remember how Bush got elected because his father was the President? The only reason Hillary has made it this far is because her husband was the President.
2007-12-04 13:26:10 · answer #2 · answered by DOOM 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes. I worked for the feds under Bill, and corruption did increase. Bigger government means larger amount of corruption. Look at Bush. He centralize the government, and look how much corruption came from it. When the purchasing was done by a 100 local offices, a company needs to bribe 100 buyers. No it is centralized, they just need to bribe 1. They are less likely to be caught and it's cheaper to bribe 1 than a hundred. If you worked in the Government, you would realize that the social programs of the Democrats is just a mean to take tax payers money and give it to corporation. Increase spending goes to construction companies and suppliers. My friends in other agency tells me that they have stock piles of goods for the poor that get's thrown away. These items are not for the poor, but just pretext for our government to buy it from certain companies.
2007-12-04 13:24:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes indeed.....Hillary is guided by a corporate mentality.....corporate meaning corporation...........corporations make money. Government exists to protect individual rights. Unfortunately making money as a politician cannot be done while fully protecting individual rights. One motive contradicts the other. Ron Paul would definitely be your guy if your aware of the HUGE corruption problem in Washington.
2007-12-04 14:03:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Given the rampage of corruption going on now at the White House, I'd have to say your husband is a dolt.
2007-12-04 14:34:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Of course your husband is right.
A vote for Hillary would mean a corrupt sense of morales and a total failure on our part to stop it!
2007-12-04 14:17:38 · answer #6 · answered by Stars and Stripes 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Sounds like you have a smart family and he has done his homework. Yes. Corruption is just one of the highlights to expect from candidate Clinton. After 30 years of experience & no change.
2007-12-04 13:42:40 · answer #7 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
YES!. Her and her husband are both corrupt. Just check all the stuff they took from the White House when they left it. And don't get me started on all the illegal money they have taken over the years.
2007-12-04 13:26:48 · answer #8 · answered by pms 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes. I agree 100%
2007-12-05 00:08:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't this just more of the low-level campaign to cloud the net with misinformation? It certainly appear that way to me. Just volunteers destroying what little hope of really providing useful and much information for the voting public.
Good job! Technology makes life better. Damn.
2007-12-04 13:23:11 · answer #10 · answered by JIM 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes and Sadamm was one of the key players in 9-11.
And to the Liberals yes Bush might have had information but what the heck was he going to do? Do you think Gore would have done anything? Oh he might have posted something on the internet he created.
2007-12-04 13:21:42 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋