58 Years is the original age limit for retirement prescribed for a government servant by the govt. of India for a long time when the Government servant used to retire from his service on the date of completion of his 58th year, which later changed to the last day of the month of his completion of the 58 years.
Later the retirement age limit has been changed to 55 years for some time, again to 58 years which again changed to 60 years.
Here also lot of sub clauses came into picture like central govt. state govt., in private sectors, scientists, University staff etc. each having its own age limits and so on….
Of late it appears that this is likely to be further revised to 62 years.
From all this it appears that the retirement age limit is getting politicized to gain vote!
Thus on one hand a single man alone is continuously working up to 62 years and on the other hand the younger generation are becoming more and more jobless, leading to frustration, disappointment, violence etc.,.?
2007-12-04 05:13:43 · 3 answers · asked by chandrasekharam b 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
i do belive 62 is about the wright age any thing over that is a comfort zone the have lost touch with the public and get stuck in there thinking
2007-12-04 05:40:17 · answer #1 · answered by butterfly 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we're talking elected government servants, there should be no "retirement", as no one should serve two terms in anything.
If we keep electing the same people over and over, we're inviting the same problems that we experienced under the monarchy.
The whole idea of the Constitution was to have a government small and simple enough to be manageable by amateurs.
2007-12-04 13:48:36 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Politician's. House; 6 yrs. Senate; 6 yrs. no retirement benefits. All others 25 yrs. No federal sponsered medical insurance.
2007-12-04 14:01:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋