first off the NIE report doesnt say with certainty that Iran is not pursuing nukes but that aside, the NIE was supposedly lying when they said Iraq was pursuing weapons, they were supposedly wrong in 2003 when they said Iran was pursuing nuclear weapons but NOW they must be right, and the Administration has been lying.
2007-12-04 03:50:10 · 20 answers · asked by CaptainObvious 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
thanks mike for pointing to exactly what Im talking about that report was from the NIE.
2007-12-04 03:56:40 · update #1
Well, its not that. The NIE estimates and assessments have consistantly supported the Democratic viewpoint. For innstance, despite the dishonest claims of Bush and the right-wing, the NIE never said in the last 4 years that Iran was continuing to pursure nuclear weapons. That claim was dreamed up by Bush and Cheney--but never with any actual evidence to support it.
All the NIE has done is clairified their esitimates--not changed them. And--they have again proven Bush to be a barefaced liar. He's known this for some time--a fact which prety much everyone knew.
2007-12-04 03:57:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Retreat & Defeat at any cost>Or logic>They will be a the rampage know>Look see what they said no nukes being made>>>>>To day that we know about>They agreed with them last time when they said the were WMD> see what happen when they havent found any yet>There a mess and hard to understand>
2007-12-04 11:57:01 · answer #2 · answered by 45 auto 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iran may have put their nuclear program on hold in 2003 because they lacked a reactor to refine the nuclear fuel needed for the bomb.
2007-12-04 11:53:47 · answer #3 · answered by Overt Operative 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Politics, politics, politics.
Remove the names, throw them into a sack, shake that sack up, roll them all out, and "Guess What"?? Not a 'continental's worth of difference' !!!
At that / the time, it all depends on who is pitching, and who is catching.
2007-12-04 13:04:33 · answer #4 · answered by I'M HERE 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Democrats???? Are you forgetting how Bush cherry picked intelligence??? Look at the cost of Bush's cherry picking.
2007-12-04 12:31:14 · answer #5 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Almost Every Democrat agreed when Clinton mentioned "Saddam has WMD" in the 90s and upto the vote for War too.
2007-12-04 11:55:18 · answer #6 · answered by Samm 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
A man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest. Amen.
2007-12-04 12:01:45 · answer #7 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
lol just like bush supported and agree with intelligence that iaq had wmd's while other reports conflicted it.could it be that both sides cherry pick intelligence for their own agenda?
2007-12-04 12:13:08 · answer #8 · answered by tyler "god of typos" 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Pretty sure there are republicans that disagree with iran too... lets try to be less hostile buds, share the love!
2007-12-04 11:52:45 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
not just the demos! they are all liars and they all (eachparty) believes what they think will make the the party of choice! it is so screwed - beyond repair - just live!
2007-12-04 11:53:49 · answer #10 · answered by ear person 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋