English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

15 answers

The homosexual agenda has a goal of getting into every nook and cranny that our children are involved in so they can indoctrinate the next generation of boys and girls into accepting their behavior as the norm. It is a well known fact that the more we are exposed to something the more accepting of it we become.

2007-12-04 03:28:08 · answer #1 · answered by M 6 · 4 1

To them it maybe critical, but to society on the whole is is critical that openly gay do not become hands on scout leaders. No pun was intended. Someone that likes same sex don't necessarily like children sexually, but feel role model adults pay in young children's lives makes it highly inappropriate for active homosexual to act as leader.
In some cases it is not an easy call such as where you have moral homosexual that does not act in inappropriate manner they should be allowed as long as they pay all attorneys fees to draw up guidelines on conduct that would cause immediate dismissal.

2007-12-04 11:40:15 · answer #2 · answered by Mister2-15-2 7 · 1 0

It's not. In fact, if the BSA (Boy Scouts of America) were to allow gay leaders, they'd likely lose a vast amount of their support which comes largely from conservative churches.
This could truly be a matter of survival for the BSA and that is why they are fighting it so hard.
Gay rights activists are intent on forcing the BSA to allow gay leaders because they believe they are being discriminated against. While this is probably true, one must ask if discrimination should be allowed in certain instances - such as the ***** college tuition fund should not give aid to white or Latinos.
I can't imagine why a gay man would want to be in the BSA any more than an African-American would want to be in the KKK.

2007-12-04 11:35:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Since they believe that they are no different than straight men they feel that they should not be discriminated against, and should be allowed to be troop leaders. It is the same reason that women feel the need to get into all male institutions (The Citadel) or that black people want to get into all white country clubs (Augusta National). The major difference is that women and minorities were born that way. Gay men made a conscious decision as to their sexuality.

2007-12-04 11:19:30 · answer #4 · answered by The Oracle of Delphi 6 · 2 2

Gay men should not be boy scout leaders and should be kept as far for the boys as possible, Oh I know lets send them to Iran where everyone knows there are no gays.

2007-12-04 11:34:14 · answer #5 · answered by sapphire 4 · 2 2

Its critical to be with little boys

2007-12-04 13:25:30 · answer #6 · answered by o_o 4 · 0 1

To tear down the Boy Scout core values and morals. Because Boy Scouts grow up and vote republican.

2007-12-04 11:13:52 · answer #7 · answered by Curtis 6 · 5 3

Because the Girl Scouts don't want them

2007-12-04 11:18:22 · answer #8 · answered by jeffwey m 4 · 5 1

So the Boston Archdiocese will have someone to have tea with.

2007-12-04 11:19:30 · answer #9 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 3 0

So they could get leadership experience, and use that to run for congress as a Republican.

2007-12-04 12:39:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers