Hillary for president?

Question

If given the option how many of you would vote for Hillary Clinton? Do you think its morally wrong for a woman to become president. Or do you think its unjust for a woman not to have been president for so many years?

What makes you all so inclined to dislike Hillary?

Would you rather have Obama? Isn't he quite inexperienced?

Answer 1

I'd vote for Hillary over quite a few of her possible contenders for the throne, so to speak, if I could. However, those who wax nostalgic about the Clinton years, are apt for a big suprise when they realize that Hillary Clinton ain't her bloody husband and does not think like him and has a mind of her own! The United States is the ONLY developed nation besides Russia, that has NOT had a woman as president, chancellor or prime minister. Even less developed and advanced nations have done this: Israel with Golda Meir, India with Indira Gandhi, Pakistan with Bhuto, Phillipines with Corazon Aquino. And the bloody UK had our Margaret Thatcher [And if bloody Yorkshire ain't third world, what is?], and whether you loved the old tart or not, it wasn't the death of the UK, and likewise the election of Hillary, should it occur in 2008, will probably not be the death of the USA, esp. as you bloody yanks have so many other things that'll likely cut short your carreer as a super-power like bullying sovereign nations.

You Americans should be aware that when Georgie Porgie wanted his bloody adventure into Iraq, Senator Hillary Clinton rubberstamped it with a "Yes, Massah". She might not be the bloody Messiah of the Left that some think either.

Answer 2

Hillary would make a very good but questionable president of a local PTA organization. NO - I will not vote for her. It would be great to see a woman, or a black person, or any other race as president as long as they are honest, capable and serving in the best interest of the United States and the citizens of the U.S. Other than being a woman Clinton does not fit any of these. She is a democratic version of Bush; can not tell the truth, can not commit, and – by her own admission she voted for the Iraq war without even reading the intelligence reports. How could anyone send soldiers to DIE in a questionable war without studying the situation first? She has had no significant success as a Senator and her other background is saturated with involvement with criminal activities. The only bills she introduced that were passed were mediocre things with no important national impact (look at her web site; she barely earned her wages as a senator!). She has been trying for 15 tears to get support for her health plan but can not get support from the democrats or republicans.

Answer 3

Not morally wrong for a woman to have become president but horribly wrong if Hillary becomes president. I will never vote for her under any circumstance.

I don't think it is either morally wrong or unjust that a woman has not been president

The right candidate has not come forward

*******************************************************************
Answers to your other questions:

What makes you all so inclined to dislike Hillary? As "Freethinker" put it - I LOVE THIS: She's frigging nuts, amoral, and apt to say/do whatever it takes to get her in the presidency. She flip flops like a deranged rabbit, lies frequently, and slings more dirt than a backhoe.

Would you rather have Obama? Isn't he quite inexperienced?
Yes very inexperienced but most level headed of the Dem.

Answer 4

I have no problem with a woman being president, nor do I believe it is unjust that none have been elected. There hasn't been any women to make a serious run at the presidency before.
I wouldn't vote for Hillary because I think she is dishonest, and stands for nothing. She tells whomever she talking to what thay want to hear. She than contradicts herself when speaking to a different group. I believe she has been involved in criminal activity with regard to Whitewater & the disappearance of Vince Foster. As for experience, She has only held a Senate seat for slightly longer than Obama. Whereas Obama has held some sort of elected office much longer. Masquerading as first lady doesn't equal experience. It was also shady how she sought out New York due to her chances of getting elected. She had no ties to New York. She doesn't care about, or even understand the lives of New Yorkers. She is a power hungry fraud, just like her husband.

Answer 5

I wouldn't vote for Clinton under any circumstances whatsoever. It has absolutely nothing to do with her being a female.

I do not think it is morally, or in any other way, wrong for a woman to run or to become President.

I do not think it is unjust that we have never had a woman President.

Answer 6

I think it's a stretch to call her a woman! It's just wrong for an immoral woman or man to be president. Seeing what women have done to this country makes me question whether they even deserve the vote!

Answer 7

She lies. She changes her story daily for the audience she is speaking to. She cheats. She sells her influence in the Senate to China (caught at it TWICE, anybody else would be in prison) and then complains about Obamas campaign. She is a socialist or a communist, I can't tell because of her changing her story all the time. She would and probably has sold part or all of the US to some half asssed thing called NAU which she and others contrived at Bilderburg conferences. I can't tell you how much I detest her and people like her. (ex. Bush, BJ Clinton, Bush 1, etc.)

I don't know if she is a woman or not. I DO want to see a woman in the office because I think an honest, intelligent woman would do a much better job than the clowns we have had for 25 years. I just don't want it to be another clown and especially a hateful, cheating, lying thieving one.

Answer 8

After watching fox news (hannity & colmes) and her past affiliation with a communist newspaper and it's staff...there's NO reason on the face of this earth I would EVER vote for her. Let alone her affiliation with crooked chinese business men and her campaign financing issues with them.
I have no problem having a woman for pres. I DO have a problem having BILL back in the White House after we IMPEACHED his a**.

kira d:
you said "even less developed nations have had a woman for president"--perhaps that's one reason they're less developed third world countries?...let alone Islam and radical fundamentalists basically run the country?
Perhaps if it weren't for "georgie porgie" you blokes could have been getting IED's on your busses and trains every day. Yeah, we'll cut and run and see what happens with all the radical fundamentalists ya'll have over there....

Answer 9

There isn't a "moral impropriety" or "unjustness" here. It just hasn't happened yet. Don't forget there are only a very small number of people that have been our President and they just happen to all be men.

Remember also that she isn't the first women to run for the office. Please recall Geraldine Ferraro.

And I sincerely hope that she wins her party's nomination and runs for office because she in no way can win the election, and we will finally be done with her lies and deceit.

cheers.

Answer 10

I would vote for a woman for president....just not that woman. Hillary as president ....ughhhh...makes my sick to my stomach just thinking about it. EDIT: Refer to Freethinker 's post it explains why people dislike the Hildabeast.