With all pro-war Republican candidates being pushed front and center and so many American's fed up with the war, it would seem that the Republican's are setting themselves up to lose the election and that Hillary has already been elected as President!
This entire upcoming 2008 election is a scam! They force us to be so fed up with Republican's. that they thought America would be forced Dem - NO
More proof that this Global Agenda and War (Iraq & Iran) will continue and that the economy in America is being set up to collapse.
Why, so they can claim we can be bailed out by joining Canada and Mexico as one large international trade union. That is where the Amero comes in - one currency for all the America's. The Elite Powers in Washington will pass it off as an economic bail out for America and force us all into going along with it.
Just like the EU and the Euro - this is the next bug step in the Global One World Government - One World Currency
America as we know is dead
2007-12-04 02:31:47 · 12 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
And this is exactly why we should vote Ron Paul.
He is the only candidate bringing up the issue of our currency, and also the only anti-war Republican candidate who is honest enough to tell it like it is, even if the american people do not want to hear it.
Ron Paul is not for Global one world government, but actually for small government that will not interfere with our every day lives.
If we voted for Ron Paul and it ended up being Paul vs. Clinton we would actually stand a chance at saving America and saving the constitution!!
2007-12-04 02:49:46 · answer #1 · answered by Kelsette 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
First of all - I do not think Clinton will represent the Democratic Party (if so I vote republican; any republican but Giuliani). I have studied her and her record; she is not what she is trying too pass her self of as. Her record shows she barely earned her wages as a senator. She claims a lot of experience but I can not find any that has had any significant benefit to the U.S. as a whole. She voted to send soldiers to die in Iraq without even reading the intelligence reports (by her own admission), she is taking contributions from known felons and one the FBI was looking for (she took the money rather than report the person). Clinton is another Bush. Most disturbing is she supports giving amnesty to the illegal aliens.
2007-12-04 04:47:14 · answer #2 · answered by Dallen B 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
America seemed to survive Vietnam and even more devestating and costly conflict then Iraq war. Your pessimism is misplaced and baseless. Hillary Clinton as a dem candidate is a republican dream since they can bring her husband's daliances in the White House to the forefront. Afterall would you vote for a candidate with a possible first lady who was a whore and a skank? That will be the ultimate double standard if Hillary wins despite her husband being a skank chaser.
2007-12-04 02:39:59 · answer #3 · answered by wrathofkahn03 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I think George Bush and cohorts are the only ones pushing for this combination of North American powers. The problem with that is that the U.S. is the super power and, while Canada takes care of itself, the Southern section is filled with the desperately poor, corrupt governments and drugs. The only ones benefiting would be corporations seeking cheap labor. Who needs it?
In his push to eliminate social programs, Bush has succeeded in bringing our country into economic disaster, with huge debts, huge expenditures, and domestic woes. While he yelps about SS going broke, he has borrowed 4 trillion from its funds.
His dream of war with Iran is hopefully thwarted by the recent Pentagon report on Iran's nuclear power. But this does not help the woefully neglected domestic situation, with the Middle Class of America struggling to keep the wolf from the door. In the meantime, he is building permanent bases, and various governmental buildings in Iraq, along with the World's Largest Embassy.
We would do well with Hillary Clinton as president. No president will perform miracles after inheriting this debt-ridden mess, but at least it would be a first step toward sanity.
2007-12-04 02:46:11 · answer #4 · answered by Me, Too 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
America is not dead.
And we need a Democrat in office (not necessarily Clinton) but republicans are CRAZY and have some off the wall ideals.
Our economy won't collapse, we might go through a rough patch, but collapse is a little extreme don't you think?
ps the war sucks.
2007-12-04 02:42:44 · answer #5 · answered by stressed to the MAX 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The only chance the Republicans have of electing the next President is to start RIGHT NOW to back the anti-war candidate::RON PAUL!!!
I feel the 70% of American people that are for PEACE can unite and elect Ron Paul, who offers "Hope For America!
*******************************************************
2007-12-04 03:11:47 · answer #6 · answered by beesting 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no, they want to win very badly but they represent a weak and tarnished label.
it is not a sure thing that hillary will be the next pres.
2007-12-04 02:40:12 · answer #7 · answered by Constipated CON. 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You need to look at the whole picture, not just one or two issues. No one wants war...really. Don't you think any incoming president would love to bring our troops home? But simply packing up and returning could have devastating results for us and Iraq...and the entire middle east.
Just vote Huckabee...horrilbe name...way more balanced than I realized. :-)
2007-12-04 02:35:54 · answer #8 · answered by springboardforsuccess 2 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Well, we need a Democrat, especially Clinton, to come and fix what Bush messed up in his eight years as president.
If not, the economy WILL collapse, GLACIERS WILL MELT and it will be the end of the world.
2007-12-04 02:35:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
The one world government is going to totally rock!
2007-12-04 02:35:13 · answer #10 · answered by Abe 3 · 0⤊ 4⤋