2007-12-04 01:46:22 · 32 answers · asked by airforcewolf 4 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Yes, you are right.You never suffer from any guilt if you do abstain from sex before marriage.I would suggest you to maintain this which is so rare these days.
This will give you tremendous satisfaction when you go for real sex only after marriage . This is Great !!!
I wish you all the Best.
God Bless
2007-12-04 01:52:19 · answer #1 · answered by bikashroy9 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It might if you are a good match.
When people got married at age 16 abstinence might have been OK and practical. Today most people wait till they are in their 30th. It is not realistic to expect anyone to wait for the right partner for that long.
Marriages are suppose to be for life and your sexual relationship is a big part of a good marriage. It should click in the bedroom and one should know that before making a commitment which bond you for years to come.
To keep the honeymoon excitement couples can always opt to be abstinent for a month or longer before they get married.
Marriage is an man made institution. If partners are committed to each other I see nothing wrong with a sexual relationship at any time married or not.
2007-12-04 01:57:08 · answer #2 · answered by Iris R 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i want to say yes so BAD but nay, and I say no because I've been around so knowing the next one could be better or worst makes the looking around so worth it. But then I would say yes because my first bf was my first at everything and we were together 7 years with just each other. The fact i didnt lack the emotional nor the sex part kept me content I waited. Then when he passed i started dating and met a man who was on 3 inches long....very very different from my first. I think the size would be the only reason why women should find out what they have to work with. Trust me..as innocent as I was..that just didnt cut it for me.
2007-12-04 01:52:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There was a segment on the M and J Morning Show (Fox) just yesterday on this very fact.
From data they have now it shows by waiting to loose virginity until married or until later in life can cause anxiety problems.
There are also a number of other studies done by both federal and states that indicate the same here are a few if you care to read them:
http://www.libchrist.com/sexed/AbstinenceLies.html
http://www.libchrist.com/New2004-5/virginitystds.html
http://www.libchrist.com/bible/purityharmsyouth.html
http://www.libchrist.com/sexed/abstinanceMn.html
http://www.libchrist.com/sexed/abstinance.html
If you look around you can find that abstinance is not good for your health or marriage.
You must decide for yourself what is best for you.
2007-12-04 01:57:44 · answer #4 · answered by pinelake302 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Good question. I would surmise that it could be more exciting at first, because you've waited so long and built up so much sexual tension and desire that you can finally, finally act on. Your first time is always a life-altering experience. At the same time, however, it may be rather awkward and anticlimactic because neither of you know what you are doing; also by saving it so long you've built it up to be this amazingly super special thing - and doing so is making a bigger deal out of sex than it really is, so the real thing could be anticlimactic.
2007-12-04 01:50:47 · answer #5 · answered by tidy mess 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There were good reasons God prohibited sex outside of marriage. Fulfillment is just one. True intimacy is lost also, if it happens before, and all the other resulting problems can happen if people do this before marriage.
2007-12-04 01:50:05 · answer #6 · answered by Jed 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Some of these answers amaze me! I'm positive it depends on your personal beliefs. My mother taught me to "do what feels good" because her sexual experiences weren't up to par. So, I jumped in the sack at the first sign of sexual stirrings. However, I do harbor a "guilt" at not saving myself for my husband. Not because of his viewpoints, but because of mine. In hindsight, I should've experienced sex with someone who LOVED me. No matter what size he is, how fast we can figure out what we are doing, etc; if we loved each other-we'd make it feel right. If it's love, we'll figure out what makes each other happy...that's why time makes it better. It's the mutual WANT to fullfill your partner in all ways that makes it so great. (Just one person's opinion!)
2007-12-04 02:19:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its more fulfilling when you have a genuine emotion for the person you're with. Just doing it to do it has no meaning and really no satisfaction.
2007-12-04 01:50:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wouldnt think so. usually your first time is incredibly stressful and for the woman can even be extreamly painful.
why wait until your married to deal with that? and besides, if you wait until your married, how will you know if you and your partner are even compatible in bed??? sometimes 2 people just DONT work. like there was this one guy i was seeing. we had sex once. well, i guess it would be more like 1/2 a time cause it just didnt work. he was WAY too small (like 2 inch MAX). if i had waited and married that, well that would have just sucked.
my mom even told me after she got divorced and had been dating a new guy for a while that she wished that my father hadnt been her frist because she never knew what she was missing!!! not that i wanted to hear that, but its true.
2007-12-04 01:52:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes. I am and it is the best thing to just wait for the man and marry. It works out and is the best thing to do it according to the norms of your beliefs. So dont do things to suit others.... do them for yourself if you respect and trust yourself. MG
2007-12-04 01:49:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋