Sounds good to me.
2007-12-04 01:09:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Chelsea Clinton's father did not lead us into war with false intelligence. Bush did. This is the reason so many people have suggested that the twins go to fight in Iraq, so Bush would know the anguish and suffering of parents with children over there. Nor did Clinton cause the suffering in Darfur.
Actually, in other wars, the families of Presidents and families of millionaires did volunteer. FDR's son was in the war. All of the Kennedys old enough to fight were in WW 2, two of them losing their lives.
I think perhaps the children of Presidents like young people everywhere have a right to control their own lives. The sins of the parents are not the burden of the children to carry, even though the stigma might be there. However, if any man is going to send other people's children to war, he had best be open and honest about his reasons and not call it a defensive move when, in truth, it is a lust for money and power..
2007-12-04 10:33:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Me, Too 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you sound like a good candidate for a teacher in Darfur, you could teach kindness and understanding to the poor confused people of Iraq.
You are just what the world needs,
another George Bush speech writer.
2007-12-04 09:38:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by t-bone 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
She has a life of her own. She's intelligent enough to know when she's had enough of the political scumbags in Washington and that whole scene.
By the way what's holding all you self righteous people back? You should show the same compassion as you expect out of her.
Holy crap! I'm defending Chelsea Clinton? I had a Border Collie named "Chelsea". Maybe that's what made me do it.
2007-12-04 09:48:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Because the people in Darfur don't vote in the US elections and the people in the US don't really care about Darfur.
Now if it was different, she'd be there in a heartbeat, mommy would make sure of it.
2007-12-04 09:12:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
She is a rich girl who doesn't care about the poor people. If she ever runs for a political office she will lie and say she does but she is after all her mother's daughter.
2007-12-04 09:13:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sherilynne B 6
·
2⤊
2⤋
Why aren't you? What does Chelsea Clinton have to do with anything? She's a private citizen.
2007-12-04 10:23:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by npk 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
She's too busy making money on Wall Street.
2007-12-04 09:18:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by thegubmint 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Are you still trying to over compensate for your lack of courage and conviction regarding your not enlisting to fight a fight YOU think is worthwhile?
2007-12-04 09:28:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
PROBABLY THE SAME REASON ALL OR ANY OF ROMNEYS SONS AREN'T IN IRAQ.
2007-12-04 09:25:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by Izzat7 4
·
2⤊
1⤋