Since it turns out Iran is NOT trying to make a nuclear weapon, shouldn't Bush apologize saying the world has to support an attack on Iran to prevent World War III?
"If you're interested in avoiding World War III, it seems like you ought to be interested in preventing them from having the knowledge necessary to make a nuclear weapon."
2007-12-04
00:29:50
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Sure he should, civil_av. Now what about Bush?
2007-12-04
00:34:26 ·
update #1
That's right, the President never lies. He only receives bad intelligence. Where have we heard THIS before...?
2007-12-04
00:36:29 ·
update #2
Bush and do not forget our lil war mongering candidates .
2007-12-04 00:33:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
neither is stupid, yet Ahmanijad is working no longer elementary on arising nuclear weapons, spitting the West nostril in it, and calling for wipping Israel off the face of the earth. Iran is the administrative sponsor of Islamofascism and must be stopped earlier that's merely too overdue. whether that's going to be President Bush or yet another president who will handle Iran, that's significant handle the Iranian threat the way the U.S. dealt with Japan. as much as we do in contrast to taking that step, we can't have lots determination in gentle of Iran's non-end push of Islamofascism. handle Iran, and you have got a actual threat for peace interior the international. Islamfascism would be defeated.
2016-10-19 02:55:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In your quote, which you failed to attribute, you make no mention of attacking Iran. It simply says that we should keep them from developing nuclear weapons.
If you're going to "quote" people to make your point, you should probably have someone else read it first, to see if it actually backs you up.
No. President Bush does not owe Iran an apology.
2007-12-04 00:45:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush has never said that he supports attacking Iran. If he had, there would be bomb craters in Tehran.
And Iran has "suspended" its nuclear bomb program. It still is enriching uranium and developing delivery vehicles. It's a small step to restart warhead development.
And it's funny that such confidence is placed in American intelligence by the left who constantly derides it on any other matter.
2007-12-04 00:37:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Philip McCrevice 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Some people will never understand will they and I'm talking about you. Their President has said he wants to rid the world of Israel and says America is the great satan so who should I believe knucklehead? Nobody wants war so want you tell that to the terroists and the fanatical leaders around the globe. You seem to be fixated at looking at things only the way you want to which shows a lack of understanding and narrowmindedness. Cut your hair ha, ha.
2007-12-04 04:17:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by toughguy2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, how silly. The President relies on intelligence information to make claims to begin with. People in the security services who make wrong assessments should apologize to President Bush.
Now that there are conflicting opinions, it is foolish to pick the one you like over the one you are afraid of.
2007-12-04 00:34:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
maybe to iran..... but i don't think it is very necessary to do it to ahmadi... because he will win a too much power and for the coming presidential elections (nov 2008) it s not good because he could be re elected.... and nobody in this world wants that!!!!
2007-12-04 00:39:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by MOI 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No - Would you apologize to Hitler? Have you read what this man has said about the Jews? Why do you support an ignorant, hateful bigot?
It must be true what they say about how socialism leads quickly to fascism huh?
2007-12-04 00:36:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
No. Why do you believe this report when you have believed none of the others?
It seems you are only willing to believe what you want.
Let's hope that they did get the intelligence right this time and that we are not missing something.
2007-12-04 00:35:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Locutus1of1 5
·
3⤊
2⤋
Did I miss something, what makes you so sure they aren't trying to make weapons?
2007-12-04 00:37:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by G-gal 6
·
1⤊
0⤋