Because,there is no profit to be made providing people with health care,war on the other hand...
2007-12-04 00:31:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by lalalalaconnectthedots 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
What child do you know ever been turned away from medical attention? Who do you know has kids ever been turned away by hospital doctors? Don't you think that if there truly was a problem with our health care one: we would not be having people sneaking in, or actually being able to afford to come here, from other countries all around the world trying to get health care that actually works, and two: if kids are being neglected for any kind of treatment or not getting the right treatment, do you not think it would be the parents of the children making a huge fuss and not a bunch of desperate leftist politicians trying to turn this country into a socialist country by making the people all the more dependent by handouts?
If kids were actually getting horrible treatment that either did nothing, made it worse and actually caused their death. It would be the parents complaining about something needing to be done and not politicians. The only time a child does not receive health care is if the parents themselves do not give their own child any medical attention. I do not want my taxes to be hiked for this. Every time Hillary tried to get this passed it failed because there was a lack of children to sign on since, well, pretty much everyone can get medical attention when they need it without having to wait 3-6 months down the road on a waiting list!
2007-12-04 01:04:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Fallen 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
After you get out from behind the 'boogyman' argument, the waving flags and the shaking crosses, if you follow the money generally you get the right answer. Power centers such as the trans-national corporations have more influence on modern events than any other single factor and the Oil Mafia is the worse offender. When you stack several million kids against several trillion dollars it's not hard to see the problem.....if you want to see it. The current GOP, firmly in bed with Big Oil has no intention of seeing it. The Democrats see the problem, but are having a hard time overcoming the propaganda war against them via the right wing talk show morons, FOX Network and the Jesus freak right. Sad but true!
2007-12-04 00:45:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Noah H 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
it incredibly is probable the main clever ingredient Bush has completed in years. This application could fee billions, and could positioned the government on top of problems with too lots of human beings's lives. Socialized drugs is the worst ingredient that should ensue to individual's healthcare. i recognize it sounds unfeeling, yet a minimum of Bush had the middle to do it. The Senate only approved yet another $one hundred fifty billion for the conflict by using a ninety two-3 vote by means of fact too many every person is petrified of looking undesirable and not helping the troops. Politicians ought to start up doing the main suitable ingredient, no longer what looks good in the paper.
2016-10-10 05:24:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Poor American children already have health care. It's called Medicaid. It's been around as long as I can remember.
2007-12-04 00:28:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The President of the US is tasked with defending the Constitution, not with providing that which parents are responsible for.
2007-12-04 00:28:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by Trollbuster 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
It's ironic because those poor children are eventually going to have to fight this war, so he should want them to be healthy now.
2007-12-04 00:40:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bryan H 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Why are Libs seeminly always wanting someone else to support their kids?
2007-12-04 00:33:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Duminos 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
hey if you want to pop out babies then you take care of them
2007-12-04 00:41:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
This is easy, kids can't vote.
2007-12-04 00:33:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by White Star 4
·
2⤊
2⤋