How can you antiglobal warming ppl, respond to these facts?

Question

The following info kills the global warming theoy.
"So, British wine-making thrived during the Medieval Warming, failed during the Little Ice Age (1300 to 1850), and began to make a comeback in the 1950s, after major world temperature surges between 1850–70 and 1920–40. The uncertain quality of today’s British wine grapes indicates that Britain still isn’t as warm now as during the Roman and Medieval Warmings. "
-Taken From http://www.cgfi.org/cgficommentary/can-british-wine-grapes-resolve-a-global-warming-question

Answer 1

It would be interesting to see their rationalizations.
However you will not begin to convince any of them.
This article shows a more accurate picture of scientists 'falling away' from their support of the movement - it really makes them more ridiculous and vocal.
From: "Global Warming Alarmism Reaches A 'Tipping Point'"
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?324d8c29-96d0-4a8c-91bf-7736fd0a5f63
"We have witnessed Antarctic ice GROW to record levels since satellite monitoring began in the 1970's. We have witnessed NASA temperature data errors that have made 1934 -- not 1998 -- the hottest year on record in the U.S. We have seen global averages temperatures flat line since 1998 and the Southern Hemisphere cool in recent years."

The temperatures have 'flat lined' and are not following the increases of CO2.

Answer 2

Here's the response.

Europe may well have been warmer (or maybe not) in the Medieval Warm Period.

But the world wasn't, and the RATE of warming was much slower then. Peer reviewed data from climatologists (as opposed to muttering from wine critics) here.

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison_png

Warming was almost certainly due to increased solar radiation at the time, except, of course nobody was measuring it then.

But now we do measure it, very thoroughly. And solar radiation has been decreasing just a little bit for years. Proof:

"Recent oppositely directed trends in solar
climate forcings and the global mean surface
air temperature", Lockwood and Frolich (2007), Proc. R. Soc. A
doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1880

http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media/proceedings_a/rspa20071880.pdf

News article at:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6290228.stm

So this in no way "kills" global warming facts. More details about this issue here:

http://environment.newscientist.com/channel/earth/climate-change/dn11644

Great website for scientific information about global warming:

http://profend.com/global-warming/

Answer 3

That is a good point. No doubt you will get responses that say your example is just a local event or that the warming was just in the northern hemisphere, but there is evidence that says the warming was worldwide.

Answer 4

Global warming is a theory and so is evolution. A theory is a theory until proven beyond reasonable doubt to be true. I challenge anyone, including scientist, here to prove global warming is true. In fact I challenge anyone to prove any theory to be true. Please test me.

Answer 5

Global Warming is not a theory, it is a fact. The media and politicians make it seem like it may not be true, but they are just trying to further their agendas.

Because of the media/politicians, I wasn't entirely sure about Global warming about a year ago. But after taking a Geological Studies class in College last semester, I know that it is true. Ask any professor, anyone in academia, it's not a theory. Internet science cannot disprove it; I know if you google the subject tons of stuff will come up saying that scientists don't agree and that it's fake, but trust me- all my professors say that it is true, so I'm going to believe them.

Answer 6

By telling you to use the Discover button. It has been answered so many times it is a waste to even respond.

Try to keep up with the crowd.

Answer 7

people should listen to Michael Jackson's songs
for example EARTH SONG
you should stop polluting the earth and you'll live longer
WEEE'll live longer